David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Military Ethics 1 (2):136-144 (2002)
While the origin and development of the just war tradition until the early modern period blended concerns, ideas, and practices from the moral, legal, political, and military spheres, from the mid-seventeenth century until the mid-twentieth it largely disappeared as a conscious source of moral reflection about war and its restraint. Beginning in the 1960s, however, American theologian Paul Ramsey initiated a recovery of just war thinking in a series of writings applying the principles of discrimination and proportionality, ideas he traced both to Augustinian theology and to natural law, to the debate over nuclear weapons and later to the Vietnam War. Ramsey's work directly engaged both theological and policy debate over military force, initiating lines of reflection that have since developed further and become increasingly institutionalized. This brief essay examines the nature of Ramsey's just war thought and its influence over the last 40 years
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
John Forge (2009). Proportionality, Just War Theory and Weapons Innovation. Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (1):25-38.
Serena K. Sharma (2009). The Legacy of Jus Contra Bellum: Echoes of Pacifism in Contemporary Just War Thought. Journal of Military Ethics 8 (3):217-230.
Davis Brown (2011). Introduction: The Just War Tradition and the Continuing Challenges to World Public Order. Journal of Military Ethics 10 (3):125-132.
Betsy Perabo (2008). The Proportionate Treatment of Enemy Subjects: A Reformulation of the Principle of Discrimination. Journal of Military Ethics 7 (2):136-156.
Similar books and articles
James T. Johnson (1991). Just War in the Thought of Paul Ramsey. Journal of Religious Ethics 19 (2):183-207.
James Turner Johnson (2006). The Just War Idea: The State of the Question. Social Philosophy and Policy 23 (1):167-195.
Richard B. Miller (1988). Love, Intention, and Proportion: Paul Ramsey on the Morality of Nuclear Deterrence. Journal of Religious Ethics 16 (2):201 - 221.
James Turner Johnson (2008). The Idea of Defense in Historical and Contemporary Thinking About Just War. Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (4):543-556.
Scott Davis (1991). "Et Quod Vis Fac": Paul Ramsey and Augustinian Ethics. Journal of Religious Ethics 19 (2):31 - 69.
Steven Metz & Phillip R. Cuccia (eds.) (2011). Defining War for the 21st Century. Strategic Studies Institute, U.S. Army War College.
James T. Johnson (1975). Natural Law as a Language for the Ethics of War. Journal of Religious Ethics 3 (2):217-242.
J. Bryan Hehir (1992). Just War Theory In A Post-Cold War World. Journal of Religious Ethics 20 (2):237-257.
Patience Coster (2013). The Ethics of War. Rosen Central.
J. T. Johnson (1994). Paul Ramsey's Just-War Doctrine. Studies in Christian Ethics 7 (2):152-154.
Steven Lee (2011). Ethics and War: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.
Robert Palter (1964). Book Review:The Limits of Nuclear War. Paul Ramsey. [REVIEW] Ethics 75 (1):71-.
Paul Ramsey (1976). Some Rejoinders. Journal of Religious Ethics 4 (2):185-237.
Ping-Cheung Lo (2012). The Art of War Corpus and Chinese Just War Ethics Past and Present. Journal of Religious Ethics 40 (3):404-446.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads21 ( #188,846 of 1,934,422 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #434,207 of 1,934,422 )
How can I increase my downloads?