David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
OUP Oxford (2012)
Spinoza's Theologico-Political Treatise is simultaneously a work of philosophy and a piece of practical politics. It defends religious pluralism, a republican form of political organisation, and the freedom to philosophise, with a determination that is extremely rare in seventeenth-century thought. But it is also a fierce and polemical intervention in a series of Dutch disputes over issues about which Spinoza and his opponents cared very deeply. Susan James makes the arguments of the Treatise accessible, and their motivations plain, by setting them in their historical and philosophical context. She identifies the interlocking theological, hermeneutic, historical, philosophical, and political positions to which Spinoza was responding, shows who he aimed to discredit, and reveals what he intended to achieve. The immediate goal of the Treatise is, she establishes, a local one. Spinoza is trying to persuade his fellow citizens that it is vital to uphold and foster conditions in which they can cultivate their capacity to live rationally, free from the political manifestations and corrosive psychological effects of superstitious fear. At the same time, however, his radical argument is designed for a broader audience. Appealing to the universal philosophical principles that he develops in greater detail in his Ethics, and drawing on the resources of imagination to make them forceful and compelling, Spinoza speaks to the inhabitants of all societies, including our own. Only in certain political circumstances is it possible to philosophise, and learn to live wisely and well.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$24.98 used (55% off) $43.60 new (21% off) $49.50 direct from Amazon (10% off) Amazon page|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Benedictus de Spinoza (1883/2004). A Theologico-Political Treatise. Dover Publications.
Yitzhak Y. Melamed & Michael A. Rosenthal (eds.) (2010). Spinoza's 'Theological-Political Treatise': A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press.
Tammy Nyden (1999). Radical Cartesian Politics: Van Velthuysen, De la Court, and Spinoza. Studia Spinozana: An International and Interdisciplinary Series 15:35-65.
Benedictus de Spinoza (2007). Theological-Political Treatise. Cambridge University Press.
Yitzhak Y. Melamed (2010). The Metaphysics of Spinoza's Theological Political Treatise. In Yitzhak Melamed (ed.), Spinoza's Theological Political Treatise: A Critical Guide. Cambridge.
Edward Halper (2004). Spinoza on the Political Value of Freedom of Religion. History of Philosophy Quarterly 21 (2):167-182.
Benedictus de Spinoza (1883/1955). Chief Works. New York, Dover Publications.
Piet Steenbakkers (2010). The Text of Spinoza's Tractatus Theologico-Politicus. In Yitzhak Y. Melamed & Michael A. Rosenthal (eds.), Spinoza's 'Theological-Political Treatise': A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press. 29.
Jonathan Israel (2010). The Early Dutch and German Reaction to the Tractatus Theologico-Politicus: Foreshadowing the Enlightenment's More General Spinoza Reception? In Yitzhak Y. Melamed & Michael A. Rosenthal (eds.), Spinoza's 'Theological-Political Treatise': A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press.
Paul J. Bagley (2008). Philosophy, Theology, and Politics: A Reading of Benedict Spinoza's Tractatus Theologico-Politicus. Brill.
Susan James (2010). Narrative as the Means to Freedom: Spinoza on the Uses of Imagination. In Yitzhak Y. Melamed & Michael A. Rosenthal (eds.), Spinoza's 'Theological-Political Treatise': A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press. 250.
James S. Preus (2001). Spinoza and the Irrelevance of Biblical Authority. Cambridge University Press.
Beth Lord (2011). 'Disempowered by Nature': Spinoza on The Political Capabilities of Women. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (6):1085 - 1106.
Michael A. Rosenthal (2010). Miracles, Wonder, and the State in Spinoza's Theological-Political Treatise. In Yitzhak Y. Melamed & Michael A. Rosenthal (eds.), Spinoza's 'Theological-Political Treatise': A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press. 231.
Raia Prokhovnik (2004). Spinoza and Republicanism. Palgrave Macmillan.
Added to index2012-04-15
Total downloads19 ( #88,643 of 1,101,088 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #59,135 of 1,101,088 )
How can I increase my downloads?