The Distinction Between Criterion and Decision Procedure: A Reply to Madison Powers

Utilitas 6 (2):177 (1994)
Abstract
Madison Powers raises the difficult problem of repugnant desires. The problem is not only difficult but pervasive, more pervasive even than Powers says. He notes that it affects hedonist, eudaimonist, and desire-fulfilment forms of utilitarianism; but it also affects the form of utilitarianism that uses a list of irreducibly plural values, so long as one of the values on the list is pleasure or happiness, and it can affect non-utilitarian positions as well for the same reason
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0953820800001552
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 20,898
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Cruz González-Ayesta (2007). Scotus's Interpretation of Metaphysics 9.2. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 81:217-230.
Joon Ho Kang (2008). Utilitarianism. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 10:221-228.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-08-30

Total downloads

22 ( #173,026 of 1,907,520 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

12 ( #53,691 of 1,907,520 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.