The humanities and gross anatomy: Forgotten alternatives [Book Review]
Journal of Medical Humanities and Bioethics 6 (2):90-98 (1985)
|Abstract||Researchers in medical education have extensively studied negative reactions to gross anatomy, sometimes grouped under the term “the cadaver experience.” Although there has been disagreement about the extent and importance of such phenomena, several attempts at curricular reform have been designed to “humanize” the student-cadaver encounter. However, some obvious sources linking gross anatomy and the humanities have been consistently overlooked. Such sources—from the history of art, the history of anatomy, and autobiographical and imaginative literature—not only bear witness to the “cadaver experience” for anatomists of the past, but also offer forgotten alternatives for placing present-day reactions in perspective. Former methods of teaching which used such material might serve as models for reintegrating the humanities into the study of gross anatomy as a possible humanizing force|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Catherine Waldby (2000). Virtual Anatomy: From the Body in the Text to the Body on the Screen. [REVIEW] Journal of Medical Humanities 21 (2):85-107.
T. Fountain (2010). Anatomy Education and the Observational-Embodied Look. Medicine Studies 2 (1):49-69.
A. Ferguson (2009). The Making of Mr Gray's Anatomy: Bodies, Books, Fortune, Fame. Medical Humanities 35 (1):59-59.
Mary G. Winkler (1989). Tragic Figures: Thoughts on the Visual Arts and Anatomy. [REVIEW] Journal of Medical Humanities 10 (1):5-12.
Ronald Pies (2008). The Anatomy of Sorrow: A Spiritual, Phenomenological, and Neurological Perspective. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 3 (1):17-.
Tatjana Buklijas (2010). Public Anatomies in Fin - de - Siècle Vienna. Medicine Studies 2 (1):71-92.
A. Cunningham (2003). The Pen and the Sword: Recovering the Disciplinary Identity of Physiology and Anatomy Before 1800 - II: Old Anatomy-the Sword. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 34 (1):51-76.
Jack Coulehan (2002). Anatomy of Anatomy, by Meryl Levin. New York: Third Rail Press, 2000. 133 Pp. [REVIEW] Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 11 (04).
Melissa Haendel, Fabian Neuhaus, David Osumi-Sutherland, Paula M. Mabee, José L. V. Mejino Jr, Chris J. Mungall & Barry Smith (2008). CARO: The Common Anatomy Reference Ontology. In Anatomy Ontologies for Bioinformatics: Principles and Practice. Springer.
Christopher E. Cosans (1997). Galen's Critique of Rationalist and Empiricist Anatomy. Journal of the History of Biology 30 (1):35 - 54.
Daniel M. Gross (2006). The Secret History of Emotion: From Aristotle's Rhetoric to Modern Brain Science. University of Chicago Press.
Michael T. Ghiselin & Stephen Jay Gould (2002). An Autobiographical Anatomy. [REVIEW] History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 24 (2):285 - 291.
Laura Kelly (2011). Anatomy Dissections and Student Experience at Irish Universities, C.1900s–1960s. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 42 (4):467-474.
James M. Humber, Paul J. Millea & Robert M. Nelson (1999). Book Reviews: The Flight From Science and Reason, Edited by Paul R. Gross, Norman Levitt, and Martin W. Lewis. NY: The New York Academy of Sciences, 1996. 593 Pp. Paperback. [REVIEW] Journal of Medical Humanities 20 (1):65-71.
Michael Ghiselin (2002). Essay Review: An Autobiographical Anatomy. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 24 (2):285-291.
Added to index2010-08-30
Total downloads2 ( #245,904 of 722,815 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,815 )
How can I increase my downloads?