The hidden self

Abstract

“The great field for new discoveries,” said a scientific friend to me the other day, “is always the Unclassified Residuum.” Round about the accredited and orderly facts of every science there ever floats a sort of dust-cloud of exceptional observations, of occurrences minute and irregular, and seldom met with, which it always proves less easy to attend to than to ignore. The ideal of every science is that of a closed and completed system of truth. The charm of most sciences to their more passive disciples consists in their appearing, in fact, to wear just this ideal form. Each one of our various ologies seems to offer a definite head of classification for every possible phenomenon of the sort which it professes to cover; and, so far from free is most men’s fancy, that when a consistent and organized scheme of this sort has once been comprehended and assimilated, a different scheme is unimaginable. No alternative, whether to whole or parts, can any longer be conceived as possible. Phenomena unclassifiable within the system are therefore paradoxical absurdities, and must be held untrue. When, moreover, as so often happens, the reports of them are vague and indirect, when they come as mere marvels and oddities rather than as things of serious moment, one neglects or denies them with the best of scientific consciences. Only the born geniuses let themselves be worried and fascinated by these outstanding exceptions, and get no peace till they are brought within the fold. Your Galileos, Galvanis, Fresnels, Purkinjes, and Darwins are always getting confounded and troubled by insignificant things. Anyone will renovate his science who will steadily look after the irregular phenomena. And when the science is renewed, its new formulas often have more of the voice of the exceptions in them than of what were supposed to be the rules.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

The Epistemic Authority of Expertise.Robert Pierson - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:398 - 405.
The ideal scientific theory: A thought experiment.Ervin Laszlo - 1973 - Philosophy of Science 40 (1):75-87.
A vague demonstration.Roy A. Sorensen - 2000 - Linguistics and Philosophy 23 (5):507-522.
The complexity of science.H. P. P. Lotter - 1999 - Koers 64 (4):499-520.
The morality of scientific openness.Christian Munthe & Stellan Welin - 1996 - Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (4):411-428.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
213 (#91,375)

6 months
20 (#126,159)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Scientific personae in American psychology: three case studies.Francesca Bordogna - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36 (1):95-134.
Scientific personae in American psychology: three case studies.Francesca Bordogna - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36 (1):95-134.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references