David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Psychology 16 (1):25 – 49 (2003)
While recognizing the theoretical importance of context, current research has treated naming as though semantic meaning were invariant and the same mapping of category exemplars and names should exist across experimental contexts. An assumed symmetry or bidirectionality in naming behavior has been implicit in the interchangeable use of tasks that ask subjects to match names to stimuli and tasks that ask subjects to match stimuli to names. Examples from the literature are discussed together with several studies of color naming and basic emotion naming in which no such symmetry was found. A more complete model of naming is proposed to account for flexible mapping of names to items. Principles of naming are suggested to describe effects of stimulus sampling, differing access to terms, task demands, and other impacts on naming behavior.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Brent Berlin & Paul Kay (1999). Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution. Center for the Study of Language and Inf.
Eleanor R. Heider (1972). Universals in Color Naming and Memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology 93 (1):10.
Jaap Van Brakel (1993). The Plasticity of Categories: The Case of Colour. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44 (1):103-135.
Debi Roberson, Jules Davidoff & Nick Braisby (1999). Similarity and Categorisation: Neuropsychological Evidence for a Dissociation in Explicit Categorisation Tasks. Cognition 71 (1):1-42.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Norton Nelkin (1987). How Sensations Get Their Names. Philosophical Studies 51 (May):325-39.
M. W. Pelczar (2001). Names as Tokens and Names as Tools. Synthese 128 (1-2):133 - 155.
Leon Horsten (2005). Canonical Naming Systems. Minds and Machines 15 (2):229-257.
Gil Anidjar (2006). Traité de Tous les Noms (What Is Called Naming). Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 10 (2):287-301.
J. Van Brakel (1982). Conventions In Naming. Philosophy Research Archives 8:243-277.
Ryan Christensen (2011). Propositional Names. Philosophia 39 (1):163-177.
Ora Matushansky (2008). On the Linguistic Complexity of Proper Names. Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (5):573-627.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #461,823 of 1,796,437 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #347,915 of 1,796,437 )
How can I increase my downloads?