David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Religious Ethics 33 (2):333 - 355 (2005)
Reformed Christianity's qualified embrace of freedom of conscience is per- haps best represented by William Ames (1576-1633). This essay explores Ames's interpretation of conscience, his understanding of its relationship to natural law, Scripture, and civil authority, and his vacillation on the sub- ject of conscientious freedom. By rooting his interpretation of conscience in natural law, Ames provided a foundation for conscience as an authority whose convictions are binding and worthy of some civil respect and free- dom. At the same time, his Puritan worldview ultimately required the deference of conscience to the superior manifestations of divine law in Scripture and civil institutions. As a result, Ames provided raw ingredients for a theological doctrine of freedom of conscience despite his unwillingness to commend the idea himself consistently. In this way, Ames symbolizes an ambiguity on freedom of conscience characteristic of the broader Reformed tradition.
|Keywords||conscience natural law Calvinism Puritan ethics William Ames|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Henry S. Richardson (1990). Specifying Norms as a Way to Resolve Concrete Ethical Problems. Philosophy and Public Affairs 19 (4):279-310.
Donald W. Shriver (1995). An Ethic for Enemies: Forgiveness in Politics. Oxford University Press.
Perry Miller (1940). The New England Mind: The Seventeenth Century. Journal of Philosophy 37 (3):79-80.
Norman Fiering (1983). Moral Philosophy at Seventeenth Century Harvard: A Discipline in Transition. Religious Studies 19 (1):139-141.
Citations of this work BETA
David Little (2006). On Behalf of Rights: A Critique of "Democracy and Tradition". [REVIEW] Journal of Religious Ethics 34 (2):287 - 310.
Lisa Sowle Cahill (2007). Theological Ethics, the Churches, and Global Politics. Journal of Religious Ethics 35 (3):377 - 399.
Similar books and articles
David Bosco (1986). Conscience As Court And Worm: Calvin And The Three Elements Of Conscience. Journal of Religious Ethics 14 (2):333-355.
Adam J. Kolber (2010). Alternative Burdens on Freedom of Conscience. San Diego Law Review 47:919-934.
Wenyu Xie (2009). The Enlightenment: Conscience and Authority in Judgment. [REVIEW] Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (2):264-281.
Daniel P. Sulmasy (2008). What is Conscience and Why is Respect for It so Important? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (3):135-149.
William Lyons (2009). Conscience – an Essay in Moral Psychology. Philosophy 84 (4):477-494.
Mark C. Murphy (1997). The Conscience Principle. Journal of Philosophical Research 22:387-407.
Uwe Meixner (1992). Table of Contents. Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 7 (1-2):1-6.
Frank Schalow (1998). Language and the Social Roots of Conscience: Heidegger's Less Traveled Path. [REVIEW] Human Studies 21 (2):141-156.
Allen Speight (2011). Conscientious Agency and the Life of Modernity. The Owl of Minerva 43 (1-2):125-138.
Michael W. Hickson (2010). Conscientious Refusals Without Conscience. Philo 13 (2):167-184.
Xie Wenyu (2009). The Enlightenment: Conscience and Authority in Judgment. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (2):264 - 281.
Peter Godman (2009). Paradoxes of Conscience in the High Middle Ages: Abelard, Heloise, and the Archpoet. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads9 ( #351,236 of 1,793,064 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #463,661 of 1,793,064 )
How can I increase my downloads?