Was wittgenstein a psychologist? (I)
Inquiry 7 (1-4):374-378 (1964)
| Abstract | Certain remarks in the Tractatus, taken together with a passage in a letter Wittgenstein wrote to Russell, suggest that at one time Wittgenstein inclined toward a psychologistic theory of language. But textual considerations with regard to the former and a special interpretation of the latter allow us to interpret these statements in a way that is consistent with Wittgenstein's later views | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesDanièle Moyal-Sharrock (2007). The Good Sense of Nonsense: A Reading of Wittgenstein's Tractatus as Nonself-Repudiating. Philosophy 82 (1):147-177.
John W. Cook (2000). Wittgenstein, Empiricism, and Language. Oxford University Press.
Max Black (1964). A Companion to Wittgenstein's `Tractatus'. Cambridge University Press.
John W. Cook (1994). Wittgenstein's Metaphysics. Cambridge University Press.
Nuno Venturinha (ed.) (2010). Wittgenstein After His Nachlass. Palgrave Macmillan.
Hilary Putnam (2008). Wittgenstein and Realism. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 16 (1):3 – 16.
Carlo Penco (2010). The Influence of Einstein on Wittgenstein's Philosophy. Philosophical Investigations 33 (4):360-379.
Matthew B. Ostrow (2002). Wittgenstein's Tractatus: A Dialectical Interpretation. Cambridge University Press.
E. D. Klemke (1971). Essays on Wittgenstein. Urbana,University of Illinois Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-08-10Total downloads9 ( #115,463 of 556,837 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #39,010 of 556,837 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
