A Journey More Important Than Its Destination: Einstein's Quest for General Relativity, 1907–1920
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In 1907, Einstein set out to fully relativize all motion, no matter whether uniform or accelerated. After ﬁve failed attempts between 1907 and 1918, he ﬁnally threw in the towel around 1920, setting himself a new goal. For the rest of his life he searched for a classical ﬁeld theory unifying gravity and electromagnetism. As he struggled to relativize motion, Einstein had to readjust both his approach and his objectives at almost every step along the way; he got himself hopelessly confused at times; he fooled himself with fallacious arguments and sloppy calculations; and he committed what he later allegedly called the biggest blunder of his career: he introduced the cosmological constant. There is a very uplifting moral to this somber tale. Although Einstein never reached his original destination, the harvest of his thirteen-year odyssey is quite impressive. First of all, what is left of absolute motion in general relativity is far more palatable than absolute motion in special relativity or Newtonian theory. And general relativity does seem to eliminate absolute space. More importantly, from a modern physics point of view, Einstein produced a spectacular new theory of gravity based on what he called the equivalence principle. This principle says that inertial and gravitational effects are due to one and the same structure, the inertio-gravitational ﬁeld, which in Einstein’s theory is represented by a metric tensor ﬁeld. In addition to laying the foundations of this theory, Einstein, among other things, launched relativistic cosmology, suggested the possibility of gravitational waves, gave the ﬁrst sensible deﬁnition of a space-time singularity, and caught on to the intimate connection between general covariance and energy-momentum conservation, an example of the general connection between symmetries and conservation laws of Noether’s theorems. These results more than make up for the—at least by the standards of modern philosophy of science—rather opportunistic way in which they were obtained..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
J. Earman & J. Eisenstaedt (1999). Einstein and Singularities. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 30 (2):185-235.
William Lane Craig (2005). Divine Eternity and the General Theory of Relativity. Faith and Philosophy 22 (5):543-557.
Robert DiSalle (1992). Einstein, Newton and the Empirical Foundations of Space Time Geometry. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 6 (3):181 – 189.
Dennis Dieks (2006). Another Look at General Covariance and the Equivalence of Reference Frames. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 37 (1):174-191.
Jeroen van Dongen (2010). Einstein's Unification. Cambridge University Press.
Max Born (1965). Einstein's Theory of Relativity. New York, Dover Publications.
Harvey R. Brown (1997). On the Role of Special Relativity in General Relativity. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 11 (1):67 – 81.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #116,541 of 1,102,505 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?