Philosophia 36 (3):355-366 (2008)
|Abstract||According to reductive intentionalism, the phenomenal character of a conscious experience is constituted by the experience's intentional (or representational) content. The goal of this article is to show that a phenomenon in visual perception called change blindness poses a problem for this doctrine. It is argued, in particular, that phenomenal character is not sensitive, as it should be if reductive intentionalism is correct, to fine-grained variations in content. The standard anti-intentionalist strategy is to adduce putative cases in which phenomenal character varies despite sameness of content. This paper explores an alternative anti-intentionalist tack, arguing, by way of a specific example involving change blindness, that content can vary despite sameness of phenomenal character.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Greg Janzen (2008). The Reflexive Nature of Consciousness. John Benjamins.
Paul Coates (2009). The Multiple Contents of Experience. Philosophical Topics 37 (1):25-47.
Greg Janzen (2006). The Representational Theory of Phenomenal Character: A Phenomenological Critique. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 5 (3-4):321-339.
Michael Pace (2007). Blurred Vision and the Transparency of Experience. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88 (3):328–354.
Max Deutsch (2005). Intentionalism and Intransitivity. Synthese 144 (1):1-22.
Michael Watkins (2008). Intentionalism and the Inverted Spectrum. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 8 (3):299-313.
David Bain (2003). Intentionalism and Pain. Philosophical Quarterly 53 (213):502-523.
Ian Phillips (2005). Experience and Intentional Content. Dissertation, Oxford University
John-Michael M. Kuczynski (2004). Some Arguments Against Intentionalism. Acta Analytica 19 (32):107-141.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads43 ( #26,222 of 551,007 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,450 of 551,007 )
How can I increase my downloads?