Philosophia Mathematica 18 (2):193-226 (2010)
|Abstract||There is an apparent tension between the open-ended aspect of the ordinal sequence and the assumption that the set-theoretical universe is fully determinate. This tension is already present in Cantor, who stressed the incompletable character of the transfinite number sequence in Grundlagen and avowed the definiteness of the totality of sets and numbers in subsequent philosophical publications and in correspondence. The tension is particularly discernible in his late distinction between sets and inconsistent multiplicities. I discuss Cantor’s contrasting views, and I conclude that his account of that distinction is only tenable if the definiteness of the set-theoretical universe is rejected|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Mary Tiles (1989/2004). The Philosophy of Set Theory: An Historical Introduction to Cantor's Paradise. Dover Publications.
Edward G. Belaga, From Traditional Set Theory – That of Cantor, Hilbert , Gödel, Cohen – to Its Necessary Quantum Extension.
J. Ferreiros (2004). The Motives Behind Cantor’s Set Theory: Physical, Biological and Philosophical Questions. Science in Context 17 (1/2):1–35.
Christopher Menzel (1984). Cantor and the Burali-Forti Paradox. The Monist 67 (1):92-107.
Edward G. Belaga, Halfway Up To the Mathematical Inﬁnity I: On the Ontological & Epistemic Sustainability of Georg Cantor’s Transﬁnite Design.
Ignasi Jané (2010). Idealist and Realist Elements in Cantor's Approach to Set Theory. Philosophia Mathematica 18 (2):193-226.
Added to index2010-08-11
Total downloads17 ( #77,959 of 722,682 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,006 of 722,682 )
How can I increase my downloads?