Identifying Optimum Performance Trade-Offs Using a Cognitively Bounded Rational Analysis Model of Discretionary Task Interleaving
Topics in Cognitive Science 3 (1):123-139 (2011)
|Abstract||We report the results of a dual-task study in which participants performed a tracking and typing task under various experimental conditions. An objective payoff function was used to provide explicit feedback on how participants should trade off performance between the tasks. Results show that participants’ dual-task interleaving strategy was sensitive to changes in the difficulty of the tracking task and resulted in differences in overall task performance. To test the hypothesis that people select strategies that maximize payoff, a Cognitively Bounded Rational Analysis model was developed. This analysis evaluated a variety of dual-task interleaving strategies to identify the optimal strategy for maximizing payoff in each condition. The model predicts that the region of optimum performance is different between experimental conditions. The correspondence between human data and the prediction of the optimal strategy is found to be remarkably high across a number of performance measures. This suggests that participants were honing their behavior to maximize payoff. Limitations are discussed|
|Keywords||Cognitively Bounded Rational Analysis Performance trade‐offs Cognitive modeling Multitasking Performance Operating Characteristic|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Keith E. Stanovich Richard & F. West (1998). Cognitive Ability and Variation in Selection Task Performance. Thinking and Reasoning 4 (3):193 – 230.
Christian P. Janssen & Duncan P. Brumby (2010). Strategic Adaptation to Performance Objectives in a Dual-Task Setting. Cognitive Science 34 (8):1548-1560.
Sergio Morra (2001). On the Information-Processing Demands of Spatial Reasoning. Thinking and Reasoning 7 (4):347 – 365.
Dan Klein, Christopher D. Manning & Kristina Toutanova, Combining Heterogeneous Classiﬁers for Word-Sense Disambiguation.
Mike Oaksford, Nick Chater & Becki Grainger (1999). Probabilistic Effects in Data Selection. Thinking and Reasoning 5 (3):193 – 243.
Troy A. W. Visser & Philip M. Merikle (1999). Conscious and Unconscious Processes: The Effects of Motivation. Consciousness and Cognition 8 (1):94-113.
Chester Wolfsont, Sara Nora Ross, Patrice Marie Miller, Michael Lamport Commons & Miriam Chernoff (2008). Domain-Specific Increases in Stage of Performance in a Complete Theory of the Evolution of Human Intelligence. World Futures 64 (5 - 7):416 – 429.
Luis Jimenez, Castor Mendez & Axel Cleeremans (1996). Comparing Direct and Indirect Measures of Sequence Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology 22 (4):948-969.
Reiko Yakushijin & Robert A. Jacobs (2011). Are People Successful at Learning Sequences of Actions on a Perceptual Matching Task? Cognitive Science 35 (5):939-962.
Added to index2011-01-11
Total downloads5 ( #169,941 of 722,774 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,774 )
How can I increase my downloads?