David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Theory and Decision 50 (2):119-148 (2001)
Focal points seem to be important in helping players coordinate their strategies in coordination problems. Game theory lacks, however, a formal theory of focal points. This paper proposes a theory of focal points that is based on individual rationality considerations. The two principles upon which the theory rest are the Principle of Insufficient Reason (IR) and a Principle of Individual Team Member Rationality. The way IR is modelled combines the classic notion of description symmetry and a new notion of pay-off symmetry, which yields different predictions in a variety of games. The theory can explain why people do better than pure randomization in matching games
|Keywords||Game theory Focal points Individual considerations|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Hykel Hosni & Jeff Paris (2005). Rationality as Conformity. Synthese 144 (2):249 - 285.
David L. Dickinson & Lynn Hunnicutt (2010). Nonbinding Recommendations: The Relative Effects of Focal Points Versus Uncertainty Reduction on Bargaining Outcomes. [REVIEW] Theory and Decision 69 (4):615-634.
Alessandra Smerilli (2012). We-Thinking and Vacillation Between Frames: Filling a Gap in Bacharach's Theory. Theory and Decision 73 (4):539-560.
Similar books and articles
F. Kramarz (1996). Dynamic Focal Points in N-Person Coordination Games. Theory and Decision 40 (3):277-313.
Judith Mehta, Chris Starmer & Robert Sugden (1994). Focal Points in Pure Coordination Games: An Experimental Investigation. Theory and Decision 36 (2):163-185.
Elinor Mason (2002). Against Blameless Wrongdoing. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5 (3):287-303.
Maarten C. W. Janssen (2001). On the Principle of Coordination. Economics and Philosophy 17 (2):221-234.
Andrew M. Colman (2003). Cooperation, Psychological Game Theory, and Limitations of Rationality in Social Interaction. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):139-153.
Maarten C. W. Janssen (2003). Coordination and Cooperation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):165-166.
Rudolph Gerber (1968). Focal Points in Recent Heidegger Scholarship. New Scholasticism 42 (4):561-577.
Alasdair I. Houston & John M. McNamara (2005). John Maynard Smith and the Importance of Consistency in Evolutionary Game Theory. Biology and Philosophy 20 (5):933-950.
Mikkel Gerken (2012). On the Cognitive Bases of Knowledge Ascriptions. In Jessica Brown & Mikkel Gerken (eds.), Knowledge Ascriptions. Oxford University Press.
Sebastian Luft (2004). Husserl's Theory of the Phenomenological Reduction: Between Life-World and Cartesianism. Research in Phenomenology 34 (1):198-234.
Mikkel Gerken (2013). Epistemic Focal Bias. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 (1):41 - 61.
Andrew M. Colman & Michael Bacharach (1997). Payoff Dominance and the Stackelberg Heuristic. Theory and Decision 43 (1):1-19.
Paul Weirich (2003). From Rationality to Coordination. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):179-180.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads9 ( #128,736 of 1,088,370 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,449 of 1,088,370 )
How can I increase my downloads?