Standpoint Epistemology without the 'standpoint'
Hypatia 12 (2):125-39 (1997)
| Abstract | In this paper I argue that the distinction between epistemic privilege and epistemic authority is an important one for feminist epistemologists who are sympathetic to feminist standpoint theory. I argue that, while the first concept is elusive, the second is really the important one for a successful feminist standpoint project | |||||||||
| Keywords | Sandra Harding epistemic privilege epistemic authority | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
  |
| External links |
 Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesKourken Michaelian (2008). Privileged Standpoints/ Reliable Processes. Hypatia 23 (1):65-98.
Sharon Crasnow (2008). Feminist Philosophy of Science: 'Standpoint' and Knowledge. Science and Education 17 (10):1089-1110.
Sandra G. Harding (2004). A Socially Relevant Philosophy of Science? Resources From Standpoint Theory's Controversiality. Hypatia 19 (1):25-47.
Cassandra L. Pinnick (1994). Feminist Epistemology: Implications for Philosophy of Science. Philosophy of Science 61 (4):646-657.
Alison Bailey (1998). Locating Traitorous Identities: Toward a Theory of White Character Formation. Hypatia 13 (3).
Kristoffer Ahlstrom (2005). Incorporating Feminist Standpoint Theory. Sats - Nordic Journal of Philosophy 6 (2):79-92.
Alison Bailey (1998). Locating Traitorous Identities: Toward a View of Privilege-Cognizant White Character. Hypatia 13 (3):27 - 42.
Rebecca Kukla (2008). Naturalizing Objectivity. Perspectives on Science 16 (3):pp. 285-302.
Kristina Rolin (2006). The Bias Paradox in Feminist Standpoint Epistemology. Episteme 3 (1-2):125-136.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-06-29Total downloads31 ( #39,358 of 549,113 )Recent downloads (6 months)18 ( #3,362 of 549,113 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
