The effects of the reach to recovery program on the quality of life and rehabilitation of mastectomy patients
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Bioethics Quarterly 2 (4):237-244 (1980)
The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of the Reach to Recovery Program of volunteers sponsored by the American Cancer Society. Effectiveness was defined as enhancing the quality of life and rehabilitation of women who had had a mastectomy, through increasing knowledge of rehabilitative procedures, post-surgery activities and level of self-esteem.The investigation was held in twelve community hospitals in Northeastern Massachusetts. Results of the investigation are reported here. It is recommended that post-operative teaching regarding proper management of rehabilitation procedures should be increased and that Reach to Recovery should be available to every woman who has a mastectomy
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Joseph T. Giacino & Charlotte T. Trott (2004). Rehabilitative Management of Patients with Disorders of Consciousness: Grand Rounds. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 19 (3):254-265.
Ray Fitzpatrick (1999). Principles and Problems in the Assessment of Quality of Life in Health Care. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2 (1):37-46.
Tristan Bekinschtein, Cecilia Tiberti, Jorge Niklison, Mercedes Tamashiro, Melania Ron, Silvina Carpintiero, Mirta Villarreal, Cecilia Forcato, Ramon Leiguarda & Facundo Manes (2005). Assessing Level of Consciousness and Cognitive Changes From Vegetative State to Full Recovery. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. Vol 15 (3-4):307-322.
Matti Häyry (1991). Measuring the Quality of Life: Why, How and What? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 12 (2).
Raphael Cohen-Almagor & Merav Shmueli (2000). Can Life Be Evaluated? The Jewish Halachic Approach Vs. The Quality of Life Approach in Medical Ethics: A Critical View. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 21 (2):117-137.
Anika A. Jordbru, Ejgil Jespersen & Egil Martinsen (2008). Conversion Gait Disordermeeting Patients in Behaviour, Reuniting Body and Mind. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 2 (2):185 – 199.
Ejgil Jespersen, Anika A. Jordbru & Egil Martinsen (2008). Conversion Gait Disorder—Meeting Patients in Behaviour, Reuniting Body and Mind. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 2 (2):185-199.
Gary Malinas & John Bigelow (2001). Simpson's Paradox: A Logically Benign, Empirically Treacherous Hydra. The Monist 84 (2):265 - 283.
Elleke Landeweer, Tineke Abma, Jolijn Santegoeds & Guy Widdershoven (2008). Psychiatry in the Age of Neuroscience: The Impact on Clinical Practice and Lives of Patients. Poiesis and Praxis 6 (1-2):43-55.
Terence J. Lovat (2010). Synergies and Balance Between Values Education and Quality Teaching. Educational Philosophy and Theory 42 (4):489-500.
Michael A. Hitt, Orley M. Amos & Larkin Warner (1983). Social Factors and Company Location Decisions: Technology, Quality of Life and Quality of Work Life Concerns. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 2 (2):89 - 98.
Helga Kuhse (1987). The Sanctity-of-Life Doctrine in Medicine: A Critique. Oxford University Press.
Andrew Day (2011). Offender Rehabilitation: Current Problems and Ethically Informed Approaches to Intervention. Ethics and Social Welfare 5 (4):348-360.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads1 ( #434,761 of 1,099,018 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?