The return of the replicator: What is philosophically signiﬁcant in a general account of replication and selection? [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Biology and Philosophy (1):109-121 (2002)
The aim of this paper is to outline a typology of selection processes, and show that different sub-categories have different explanatory power. The basis of this typology of selection processes is argued to be the difference of replication processes involved in them. In order to show this, I argue that: 1. Replication is necessary for selection and 2. Different types of replication lead to different types of selection. Finally, it is argued that this typology is philosophically signiﬁcant, since it contrasts cases of selection (on the basis of the replication processes involved in them) whereby selection causes adaptation – and, therefore, can be used in explanations of the (real or apparent) teleology of Nature – and cases in which selection lacks such explanatory power.
|Keywords||Replication Interaction Gene Natural selection|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Bence Nanay (2011). Popper's Darwinian Analogy. Perspectives on Science 19 (3):337-354.
Bence Nanay (2014). Unconscious Goals: Specific or Unspecific? The Potential Harm of the Goal/Gene Analogy. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (2):152-153.
Similar books and articles
Ralph Spiga (2001). Selection: Information and Replication of the Operant. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):556-557.
David L. Hull, Rodney E. Langman & Sigrid S. Glenn (2001). A General Account of Selection: Biology, Immunology, and Behavior. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):511-528.
A. Charles Catania (2001). Selection as a Cause Versus the Causes of Selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):533-533.
David L. Hull & Sigrid S. Glenn (2004). Multiply Concurrent Replication. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (6):902-904.
David L. Hull, Rodney E. Langman & Sigrid S. Glenn (2001). At Last: Serious Consideration. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):559-569.
Robert Alan Skipper (2001). The Causal Crux of Selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):556-556.
Bence Nanay (2001). A More Pluralist Typology of Selection Processes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):547-548.
Peter Godfrey-Smith (2001). The Role of Information and Replication in Selection Processes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):538-538.
Bence Nanay (2011). Replication Without Replicators. Synthese 179 (455):477.
Bence Nanay (2002). The Return of the Replicator: What is Philosophically Significant in a General Account of Replication and Selection? [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 17 (1):109-121.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #381,372 of 1,793,078 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #463,661 of 1,793,078 )
How can I increase my downloads?