David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy of Science 68 (4):545-564 (2001)
Polanyi's and Popper's defenses of the status quo in science are explored and criticized. According to Polanyi, science resembles a hierarchical and tradition-oriented republic and is necessarily conservative; according to Popper's political philosophy the best republic is social democratic and reformist. By either philosopher's lights science is not a model republic; yet each claims it to be so. Both authors are inconsistent in failing to apply their own ideals. Both underplay the extent to which science depends upon the wider society; and neither makes sufficient allowance for the ways it can disrupt the social order. Polanyi even demands extraterritorial exemption for science from the scrutiny of incompetent outsiders. In their different ways, each minimizes the problems of institutionalized science and fails to consider the value, even the long-term necessity, for science of democratic criticism and control. Transnational control of science is an open challenge for democratic polities
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Philip Mirowski (2004). The Scientific Dimensions of Social Knowledge and Their Distant Echoes in 20th-Century American Philosophy of Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 35 (2):283-326.
Struan Jacobs & Phil Mullins (2011). Relations Between Karl Popper and Michael Polanyi. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42 (3):426-435.
Similar books and articles
Philip Kitcher (2011). Science in a Democratic Society. Prometheus Books.
Salvatore Vasta (2010). A New “Essential Tension” for Rationality and Culture. What Happens If Politics Tries to Encounter Science Again. Axiomathes 20 (1):129-143.
Stephen M. Krason (1998). Preserving a Good Political Order and a Democratic Republic: Reflections From Philosophy, Great Thinkers, Popes and America's Founding Era. Edwin Mellen Press.
Ernst Luther (1989). Medical Ethics in the German Democratic Republic. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (3):289-299.
David Guston (1993). The Essential Tension in Science and Democracy. Social Epistemology 7 (1):3 – 23.
Hannelore Koerner (1989). Ethics in Reproductive Medicine in the German Democratic Republic. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (3):335-341.
Jordi Cat (2003). Ian C. Jarvie, The Republic of Science: The Emergence of Popper's Social View of Science 1935â1945. [REVIEW] Metascience 12 (1):75-77.
John Wettersten (2006). Essay Review ofThe Republic of Science: The Emergence of Popper's Social View of Science. Philosophy of Science 73 (1):108-121.
Mary Jo Nye (2011). Michael Polanyi and His Generation: Origins of the Social Construction of Science. The University of Chicago Press.
reviewed John Wettersten (2006). I. C. Jarvie: The Republic of Science: The Emergence of Popper's Social View of Science 1935–1945,. Philosophy of Science 73 (1):108-121.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #352,056 of 1,935,138 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #434,530 of 1,935,138 )
How can I increase my downloads?