Introduction: Genres of Blur

Common Knowledge 18 (2):220-228 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Ever since Clifford Geertz urged the “blurring of genres” in the social sciences, many scholars have considered the crossing of disciplinary boundaries a healthy alternative to rigidly maintaining them. But what precisely does the metaphor of “blurring” imply? By unpacking the varieties of visual experiences that are normally grouped under this rubric, this essay seeks to provide some precision to our understanding of the implications of fuzziness. It extrapolates from the blurring caused by differential focal distances, velocities of objects in the visual field, and competing perspectival vantage points to comparable effects in the intersection of different scholarly disciplines. Arguing against the holistic implications of Geertz's metaphor, as well as the even more totalizing concept of “consilience” introduced by E. O. Wilson, it suggests that blurring implies new types of complexity between or among those disciplines

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-02

Downloads
21 (#628,100)

6 months
2 (#658,980)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Ermanno Bencivenga
University of California, Irvine
J. Martin
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references