A Defence of Hume on Miracles - by Robert J. Fogelin
Philosophical Books 48 (2):166-168 (2007)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesRobert J. Fogelin (1998). Garrett on the Consistency of Hume's Philosophy. Hume Studies 24 (1):161-169.
Yiftach J. H. Fehige (2012). Miracles and Science: Mora Than a Miraculous Relationship. Toronto Journal of Theology 28 (1):159-163.
Chris Slupik (1995). A New Interpretation of Hume's 'Of Miracles'. Religious Studies 31 (4):517 - 536.
John Earman (2000). Hume's Abject Failure: The Argument Against Miracles. Oxford University Press.
Antony Flew (1990). Fogelin on Hume on Miracles. Hume Studies 16 (2):141-144.
Terence Penelhum (2004). Review of Robert J. Fogelin, A Defense of Hume on Miracles, Princeton. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2004 (1).
Robert J. Fogelin (1990). What Hume Actually Said About Miracles. Hume Studies 16 (1):81-86.
Richard Otte (2004). Review of Fogelin, A Defense of Hume on Miracles. [REVIEW] Hume Studies 30 (1):165-68.
Robert J. Fogelin (2008). Hume's Scepticism. In David Fate Norton & Jacqueline Taylor (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Hume. Cambridge University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-08-10Total downloads16 ( #74,716 of 549,113 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,113 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
