David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Medical Humanities 33 (1):59-64 (2007)
Wittgenstein, despite being considered an analytical philosopher, has been quoted extensively by neurologists like Oliver Sacks. This paper explores how Wittgenstein, despite suggesting that science was antithetical to philosophy, made observations relevant to cognitive neuroscience. His work on the inner and the outer, the relation between language and sensation or perception, and on the embodied nature of emotion and its communication, is important for an understanding of neurological impairment beyond our experience. In some of his enigmatic short writing his insights are pertinent to patients’ experience, say of pain, Capgras’ Syndrome and spinal cord injury. He also made observations on movement sense, will and action. He did not engage in empirical science, nor obtain data in any conventional sense. But his genius was not confined to abstract philosophy. His powers of observation and introspection led him to explore lived experience in new ways, some of which are only now being approached empirically. The method of science, he once wrote, leads philosophy into complete darkness. Had he lived today, one hopes that even he might have changed his mind
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Evan Thompson (2004). Life and Mind: From Autopoiesis to Neurophenomenology. A Tribute to Francisco Varela. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 3 (4):381-398.
Timothy J. Bayne (2004). Closing the Gap: Some Questions for Neurophenomenology. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 3 (4):349-64.
Antoine Lutz (2002). Toward a Neurophenomenology as an Account of Generative Passages: A First Empirical Case Study. [REVIEW] Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 1 (2):133-67.
Paweł Gładziejewski (2010). Neurophenomenology: An Invitation to Discussion. Avant: Trends in Interdisciplinary Studies 1 (1):179–189.
Shaun Gallagher, Neurophilosophy and Neurophenomenology. Phenomenology 2005.
Witold Wachowski (2010). Tryptyk neurofenomenologiczny. Wprowadzenie. Avant: Trends in Interdisciplinary Studies 1 (1).
Tim Labron (2009). Wittgenstein and Theology. T & T Clark.
Anthony Kenny (2006). Wittgenstein. Blackwell Pub..
Evan Thompson, A. Lutz & D. Cosmelli (2005). Neurophenomenology: An Introduction for Neurophilosophers. In Andrew Brook & Kathleen Akins (eds.), Cognition and the Brain: The Philosophy and Neuroscience Movement. Cambridge University Press. 40.
Danièle Moyal-Sharrock (2009). Introduction to Proceedings Issue of The Third Wittgenstein. Philosophia 37 (4):557-62.
John W. Cook (2004). The Undiscovered Wittgenstein: The Twentieth Century's Most Misunderstood Philosopher. Humanity Books.
S. Stephen Hilmy (1989). Wittgenstein and Behaviourism. Grazer Philosophische Studien 33:335-352.
Robert Hanna & Evan Thompson (2003). Neurophenomenology and the Spontaneity of Consciousness. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 29 (Supplement):133-162.
Danièle Moyal-Sharrock (2009). Introduction to Proceedings Issue of Third Wittgenstein. Philosophia 37 (4):557-562.
Added to index2010-08-30
Total downloads10 ( #208,659 of 1,696,586 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #345,974 of 1,696,586 )
How can I increase my downloads?