Review of a mock research protocol in functional neuroimaging by Canadian research ethics boards [Book Review]

Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (9):530-534 (2006)
Objective: To examine how research ethics boards review research projects in emerging disciplines such as functional neuroimaging.Design: To compare the criteria applied and the decisions reached by REBs that reviewed the same mock research protocol in functional neuroimaging.Participants: 44 Canadian biomedical REBs, mostly working in public university or hospital settings.Main measurements: The mock research protocol “The Neurobiology of Social Behavior” included several ethical issues operating at all three levels: personal, institutional and social. Data consisting of responses to closed questions were analysed quantitatively. Qualitative analysis of open-question responses used mixed classification.Results: Similar criteria were used by most participating REBs. Yet the project was unconditionally approved by 3 REBs, approved conditionally by 10 and rejected by 30.Conclusions: The results point to the difficulty for REBs of reviewing all kinds of research projects, regardless of field, by relying on international and national norms framed in general terms and a possible variation between REBs in the interpretation of their mandate for the protection of research subjects
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/jme.2005.012807
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,209
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Paul Dunn & Barbara Sainty (2005). The Changing Composition of Canadian Boards of Directors. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:230-233.
Terrance McConnell (2010). The Inalienable Right to Withdraw From Research. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 38 (4):840-846.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

7 ( #507,499 of 1,940,985 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #457,978 of 1,940,985 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.