David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 32 (4):705-721 (2001)
‘Ideologies of Discrimination’ considers the implications of the new genetics for understandings of personhood and for understandings of the relationship between people in groups. In particular, the essay delineates and examines the emerging notion of a ‘genetic group’ and considers the social implications of redefining families, racial groups and ethnic groups through express, and often exclusive, reference to a shared genome. One consequence of such redefinition has been the justification and elaboration of stigmatizing images of and discrimination against such groups—especially those, such as Jews and African-Americans, that have long been identified with specific somatic characteristics. A few worrisome trends begin to emerge in the response of the American legal system to the notion of genetic groups. Among these is a shift in the locus of privacy and identity from the autonomous individual to the genetic group. This shift challenges long-standing Western values that depend upon the ideological centrality of autonomous individuality
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Andrew Smart, Paul Martin & Michael Parker (2004). Tailored Medicine: Whom Will It Fit? The Ethics of Patient and Disease Stratification. Bioethics 18 (4):322–343.
Similar books and articles
L. J. (2001). Ideologies of Discrimination: Personhood and the 'Genetic Group'. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 32 (4):705-721.
B. M. Kious (2010). Genetic Nondiscrimination and Health Care as an Entitlement. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (2):86-100.
Lisa N. Geller, Joseph S. Alper, Paul R. Billings, Carol I. Barash, Jonathan Beckwith & Marvin R. Natowicz (1996). Individual, Family, and Societal Dimensions of Genetic Discrimination: A Case Study Analysis. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (1):71-88.
Margaret Otlowski (2005). Exploring the Concept of Genetic Discrimination. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 2 (3):165-176.
Eugene Oscapella (2012). Genetic Privacy and Discrimination: An Overview of Selected Major Issues. Bc Civil Liberties Association.
Neil A. Manson (2007). Why Shouldn't Insurance Companies Know Your Genetic Information? Journal of Philosophical Research 32 (Supplement):345-356.
Joseph S. Alper & Jon Beckwith (1998). Distinguishing Genetic From Nongenetic Medical Tests: Some Implications for Antidiscrimination Legislation. Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (2):141-150.
Paul Steven Miller (2007). Genetic Testing and the Future of Disability Insurance: Thinking About Discrimination in the Genetic Age. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (s2):47-51.
V. Launis (2000). The Use of Genetic Test Information in Insurance: The Argument From Indistinguishability Reconsidered. Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (3):299-310.
Mark A. Hall & Stephen S. Rich (2000). Genetic Privacy Laws and Patients' Fear of Discrimination by Health Insurers: The View From Genetic Counselors. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (3):245-257.
Karen Eltis (2007). Genetic Determinism and Discrimination: A Call to Re-Orient Prevailing Human Rights Discourse to Better Comport with the Public Implications of Individual Genetic Testing. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (2):282-294.
Kasper Lippert-rasmussen (2006). The Badness of Discrimination. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9 (2):167 - 185.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-08-30
Total downloads1 ( #507,706 of 1,679,344 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?