David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In Carlos Gershenson, Diederik Aerts & Bruce Edmonds (eds.), Worldviews, Science, and Us: Philosophy and Complexity. World Scientific. 221--231 (2007)
Our intuition tells us that there is a general trend in the evolution of nature, a trend towards greater complexity. However, there are several definitions of complexity and hence it is difficult to argue for or against the validity of this intuition. Christoph Adami has recently introduced a novel measure called physical complexity that assigns low complexity to both ordered and random systems and high complexity to those in between. Physical complexity measures the amount of information that an organism stores in its genome about the environment in which it evolves. The theory of physical complexity predicts that evolution increases the amount of ‘knowledge’ an organism accumulates about its niche. It might be fruitful to generalize Adami’s concept of complexity to the entire evolution (including the evolution of man). Physical complexity fits nicely into the philosophical framework of cognitive biology which considers biological evolution as a progressing process of accumulation of knowledge (as a gradual increase of epistemic complexity). According to this paradigm, evolution is a cognitive ‘ratchet’ that pushes the organisms unidirectionally towards higher complexity. Dynamic environment continually creates problems to be solved. To survive in the environment means to solve the problem, and the solution is an embodied knowledge. Cognitive biology (as well as the theory of physical complexity) uses the concepts of information and entropy and views the evolution from both the information-theoretical and thermodynamical perspective. Concerning humans as conscious beings, it seems necessary to postulate an emergence of a new kind of knowledge - a self-aware and self-referential knowledge. Appearence of selfreflection in evolution indicates that the human brain reached a new qualitative level in the epistemic complexity.
|Keywords||complexity evolution consciousness cognitive|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Gabriele Gramelsberger (2010). Conceiving Processes in Atmospheric Models—General Equations, Subscale Parameterizations, and 'Superparameterizations'. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 41 (3):233-241.
Similar books and articles
Francis Heylighen (1994). Fitness as Default: The Evolutionary Basis of Cognitive Complexity Reduction. In [Book Chapter].
Daniel W. McShea (1991). Complexity and Evolution: What Everybody Knows. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 6 (3):303-324.
Mr Debaprasad Mukherjee, Complexity, Biocomplexity, the Connectionist Conjecture and Ontology of Complexity.
James W. McAllister (2003). Effective Complexity as a Measure of Information Content. Philosophy of Science 70 (2):302-307.
Bruce Edmonds (1995). What is Complexity? - The Philosophy of Complexity Per Se with Application to Some Examples in Evolution. In [Book Chapter] (in Press).
Kevin Korb & Alan Dorin (2011). Evolution Unbound: Releasing the Arrow of Complexity. Biology and Philosophy 26 (3):317-338.
Börje Ekstig (2010). Complexity and Evolution: A Study of the Growth of Complexity in Organic and Cultural Evolution. [REVIEW] Foundations of Science 15 (3):263-278.
Added to index2009-02-06
Total downloads111 ( #12,272 of 1,679,437 )
Recent downloads (6 months)16 ( #14,371 of 1,679,437 )
How can I increase my downloads?