Guessing the future of the past

Biology and Philosophy 25 (1):125-142 (2010)
Abstract
I review the book “Making Prehistory: Historical Science and the Scientific Realism Debate” by Derek Turner. Turner suggests that philosophers should take seriously the historical sciences such as geology when considering philosophy of science issues. To that end, he explores the scientific realism debate with the historical sciences in mind. His conclusion is a view allied to that of Arthur Fine: a view Turner calls the natural historical attitude. While I find Turner’s motivations good, I find his characterisation of the historical sciences unconvincing. I say why in a section at the end of the review. The result is that I am unpersuaded by his thesis.
Keywords Philosophy of Geology  Philosophy of Historical Sciences
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,360
External links
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA
    Ben Jeffares (2008). Testing Times: Regularities in the Historical Sciences. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 39 (4):469-475.

    View all 10 references

    Citations of this work BETA

    No citations found.

    Similar books and articles
    Leon J. Goldstein (1962). Evidence and Events in History. Philosophy of Science 29 (2):175-194.
    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2009-03-07

    Total downloads

    57 ( #22,847 of 1,089,047 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    31 ( #2,980 of 1,089,047 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.