Hypatia 11 (3):24 - 46 (1996)
|Abstract||The noted psychologist, Doreen Kimura, has argued that we should not expect to find equal numbers of men and women in various professions because there is a natural sexual inequality of intellect. In rebuttal I argue that each of these mutually supporting theses is insufficiently supported by the evidence to be accepted. The social and ethical dimensions of Kimura's work, and of the scientific study of the nature-nurture controversy in general, are briefly discussed|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Marilena Vlad (2007). De l'unité de l'intellect à l'un absolu. Chôra 5:121-139.
Jeffrey D. Milyo & Jennifer M. Mellor (1999). Is Inequality Bad for Our Health? Critical Review 13 (3-4):359-372.
Myrtle P. Bell, Mary E. Mclaughlin & Jennifer M. Sequeira (2002). Discrimination, Harassment, and the Glass Ceiling: Women Executives as Change Agents. Journal of Business Ethics 37 (1):65 - 76.
Tim Lewens (2010). What Are 'Natural Inequalities'? Philosophical Quarterly 60 (239):264-285.
Karen A. Crain & Kenneth A. Heischmidt (1995). Implementing Business Ethics: Sexual Harassment. Journal of Business Ethics 14 (4):299 - 308.
Yolanda Estes (2009). J. G. Fichte's Account of Human Sexuality. Social Philosophy Today 25:63-73.
François Nielsen (2004). The Ecological-Evolutionary Typology of Human Societies and the Evolution of Social Inequality. Sociological Theory 22 (2):292-314.
Margaret Crouch (2009). Sexual Harassment in Public Places. Social Philosophy Today 25:137-148.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads11 ( #99,650 of 549,754 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,754 )
How can I increase my downloads?