David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy of Science 69 (3):474-496 (2002)
Logicism Lite counts number‐theoretical laws as logical for the same sort of reason for which physical laws are counted as as empirical: because of the character of the data they are responsible to. In the case of number theory these are the data verifying or falsifying the simplest equations, which Logicism Lite counts as true or false depending on the logical validity or invalidity of first‐order argument forms in which no numbertheoretical notation appears.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
S. Shapiro (1998). Induction and Indefinite Extensibility: The Gödel Sentence is True, but Did Someone Change the Subject? Mind 107 (427):597-624.
Harold T. Hodes (2004). On The Sense and Reference of A Logical Constant. Philosophical Quarterly 54 (214):134-165.
Timothy Bays (2000). The Fruits of Logicism. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 41 (4):415-421.
José Ferreiros (1997). Notes on Types, Sets, and Logicism, 1930-1950. Theoria 12 (1):91-124.
Philip A. Ebert & Marcus Rossberg (2009). Ed Zalta's Version of Neo-Logicism: A Friendly Letter of Complaint. In Hannes Leitgeb & Alexander Hieke (eds.), Reduction – Abstraction – Analysis. Ontos. 11--305.
Bird Alexander (1997). The Logic in Logicism. Dialogue 36:341�60.
Ian Proops (2006). Russell’s Reasons for Logicism. Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (2):267-292.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #137,616 of 1,140,004 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #92,708 of 1,140,004 )
How can I increase my downloads?