David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Dissertation, Australian National University (2008)
In this thesis, I argue that a good historical science will have the following characteristics: Firstly, it will seek to construct causal histories of the past. Secondly, the construction of these causal histories will utilise well-tested regularities of science. Additionally, well-tested regularities will secure the link between observations of physical traces and the causal events of interest. However, the historical sciences cannot use these regularities in a straightforward manner. The regularities must accommodate the idiosyncrasies of the past, and the degradation of evidence over time. Through an examination of how the historical sciences work in practice, I show how they can confirm these unique causal histories, and the limits to their confirmatory strategies.
|Keywords||Philosophy of Science Philosophy of Historical Sciences Confirmation Philosophy of Archaeology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Ben Jeffares (2013). Back to Australopithecus: Utilizing New Theories of Cognition to Understand the Pliocene Hominins. Biological Theory 9 (1):1-12.
Similar books and articles
Ben Jeffares (2008). Testing Times: Regularities in the Historical Sciences. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 39 (4):469-475.
Ben Jeffares (2010). Guessing the Future of the Past. Biology and Philosophy 25 (1):125-142.
Steven I. Miller & Marcel Fredericks (1991). A Case for "Qualitative Confirmation" for the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Philosophy of Science 58 (3):452-467.
James W. McAllister (1997). Laws of Nature, Natural History, and the Description of the World. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 11 (3):245 – 258.
Alan Musgrave (1974). Logical Versus Historical Theories of Confirmation. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25 (1):1-23.
Larry Arnhart (2007). The Behavioral Sciences Are Historical Sciences of Emergent Complexity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):18-19.
Carol E. Cleland (2002). Methodological and Epistemic Differences Between Historical Science and Experimental Science. Philosophy of Science 69 (3):447-451.
C. E. Cleland (2011). Prediction and Explanation in Historical Natural Science. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62 (3):551-582.
John Losee (1993). A Historical Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. Oxford University Press.
A. Tucker (2011). Historical Science, Over- and Underdetermined: A Study of Darwin's Inference of Origins. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62 (4):805-829.
Valentin Cojanu (2009). The Logic of Inquiry in Social Sciences, the Case of Economics in Particular. Social Science Information 48 (4):587-607.
Leon J. Goldstein (1962). Evidence and Events in History. Philosophy of Science 29 (2):175-194.
Hans-Jörg Rheinberger (2012). A Plea for a Historical Epistemology of Research. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 43 (1):105-111.
Carl August Lückerath (1985). Fundamental Historical Research as a Problem of Historical Sciences. On the Analysis of Historical Evidence. Philosophy and History 18 (1):85-86.
Added to index2011-04-25
Total downloads301 ( #7,081 of 1,906,796 )
Recent downloads (6 months)62 ( #8,005 of 1,906,796 )
How can I increase my downloads?