David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Minds and Machines 20 (4):489-501 (2010)
The greatest rhetorical challenge to developers of creative artificial intelligence systems is convincingly arguing that their software is more than just an extension of their own creativity. This paper suggests that “creative autonomy,” which exists when a system not only evaluates creations on its own, but also changes its standards without explicit direction, is a necessary condition for making this argument. Rather than requiring that the system be hermetically sealed to avoid perceptions of human influence, developing creative autonomy is argued to be more plausible if the system is intimately embedded in a broader society of other creators and critics. Ideas are presented for constructing systems that might be able to achieve creative autonomy
|Keywords||Computational creativity Autonomy Socially-inspired computing|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Richard E. Nisbett & Timothy D. Wilson (1977). Telling More Than We Can Know: Verbal Reports on Mental Processes. Psychological Review 84 (3):231-59.
Graeme Ritchie (2007). Some Empirical Criteria for Attributing Creativity to a Computer Program. Minds and Machines 17 (1):67-99.
R. Keith Sawyer (1999). The Emergence of Creativity. Philosophical Psychology 12 (4):447 – 469.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Y. J. Erden (2010). Could a Created Being Ever Be Creative? Some Philosophical Remarks on Creativity and AI Development. Minds and Machines 20 (3):349-362.
Gerard Casey (1988). Artificial Intelligence and Wittgenstein. Philosophical Studies 32:156-175.
Murat Aydede & Guven Guzeldere (2000). Consciousness, Intentionality, and Intelligence: Some Foundational Issues for Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 12 (3):263-277.
Margaret A. Boden (1995). Could a Robot Be Creative--And Would We Know? In Android Epistemology. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Erich Prem (2000). Changes of Representational AI Concepts Induced by Embodied Autonomy. Communication and Cognition-Artificial Intelligence 17 (3-4):189-208.
Mariusz Flasiński (1997). "Every Man in His Notions" or Alchemists' Discussion on Artificial Intelligence. Foundations of Science 2 (1):107-121.
Otto Neumaier (1987). A Wittgensteinian View of Artificial Intelligence. In Rainer P. Born (ed.), Artificial Intelligence. St Martin's Press. 132--174.
Rajakishore Nath (2009). Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence: A Critique of the Mechanistic Theory of Mind. Universal Publishers.
Salvatore Gaglio (2007). Intelligent Artificial Systems. In Antonio Chella & Riccardo Manzotti (eds.), Artificial Consciousness. Imprint Academic. 97-115.
Susan Anderson & Michael Anderson (eds.) (2011). Machine Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
Margaret A. Boden (ed.) (1990). The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence. Oxford University Press.
Hans F. M. Crombag (1993). On the Artificiality of Artificial Intelligence. Artificial Intelligence and Law 2 (1):39-49.
Luc Steels & Rodney Brooks (eds.) (1995). The "Artificial Life" Route to "Artificial Intelligence": Building Situated Embodied Agents. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Added to index2010-11-18
Total downloads28 ( #88,175 of 1,696,514 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #184,517 of 1,696,514 )
How can I increase my downloads?