Journal of Academic Ethics 10 (2):123-136 (2012)
|Abstract||Abstract We use a controlled laboratory experiment design to test rational choice theory on student whistleblowing. We examine reporting costs by comparing actual reporting behavior under anonymous and non-anonymous reporting channels. Reporting benefits are explored by considering the influence on reporting of group versus individual reward systems. We find that the type of reporting channel does not significantly influence student reporting behavior. Rewarding students based on group test scores results in significantly higher reporting rates compared to a system rewarding students based on individual test scores. Our laboratory research design allows for the measurement of actual reporting. The high reporting rates in this study emphasize the importance of clearly stating what is considered to be unethical behavior and directly asking students about their ethical environment. Content Type Journal Article Pages 1-14 DOI 10.1007/s10805-012-9154-7 Authors Iris Jenkel, St. Norbert College, De Pere, WI, USA Jason J. Haen, St. Norbert College, De Pere, WI, USA Journal Journal of Academic Ethics Online ISSN 1572-8544 Print ISSN 1570-1727|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Steven Kaplan, Kurt Pany, Janet Samuels & Jian Zhang (2009). An Examination of the Association Between Gender and Reporting Intentions for Fraudulent Financial Reporting. Journal of Business Ethics 87 (1):15 - 30.
Brian W. Mayhew & Pamela R. Murphy (2009). The Impact of Ethics Education on Reporting Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics 86 (3):397 - 416.
Steven E. Kaplan & Joseph J. Schultz (2007). Intentions to Report Questionable Acts: An Examination of the Influence of Anonymous Reporting Channel, Internal Audit Quality, and Setting. Journal of Business Ethics 71 (2):109 - 124.
Susan Ayers & Steven E. Kaplan (2005). Wrongdoing by Consultants: An Examination of Employees' Reporting Intentions. Journal of Business Ethics 57 (2):121 - 137.
Tim West, Sue Ravenscroft & Charles Shrader (2004). Cheating and Moral Judgment in the College Classroom: A Natural Experiment. Journal of Business Ethics 54 (2):173 - 183.
James M. Bloodgood, William H. Turnley & Peter Mudrack (2008). The Influence of Ethics Instruction, Religiosity, and Intelligence on Cheating Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics 82 (3):557 - 571.
M. Bloodgood James, H. Turnley William & Peter Mudrack (2008). The Influence of Ethics Instruction, Religiosity, and Intelligence on Cheating Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics 82 (3).
Bart Victor, Linda Klebe Trevino & Debra L. Shapiro (1993). Peer Reporting of Unethical Behavior: The Influence of Justice Evaluations and Social Context Factors. Journal of Business Ethics 12 (4):253 - 263.
David A. Rettinger & Augustus E. Jordan (2005). Articles: The Relations Among Religion, Motivation, and College Cheating: A Natural Experiment. Ethics and Behavior 15 (2):107 – 129.
Rafik Z. Elias (2006). The Impact of Professional Commitment and Anticipatory Socialization on Accounting Students' Ethical Orientation. Journal of Business Ethics 68 (1):83 - 90.
Kaushik Sridhar (forthcoming). Is the Triple Bottom Line a Restrictive Framework for Non-Financial Reporting? Asian Journal of Business Ethics.
Tim Barnett, Ken Bass & Gene Brown (1996). Religiosity, Ethical Ideology, and Intentions to Report a Peer's Wrongdoing. Journal of Business Ethics 15 (11):1161 - 1174.
M. Lynnette Smyth & James R. Davis (2004). Perceptions of Dishonesty Among Two-Year College Students: Academic Versus Business Situations. Journal of Business Ethics 51 (1):63-73.
Mary B. Curtis (2006). Are Audit-Related Ethical Decisions Dependent Upon Mood? Journal of Business Ethics 68 (2):191 - 209.
Added to index2012-04-17
Total downloads3 ( #202,056 of 549,198 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,198 )
How can I increase my downloads?