Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Religious Ethics 32 (2):301 - 324 (2004)
|Abstract||In "Theology and Social Theory", John Milbank critiques Scottish Enlightenment political economy and its attendant descriptive moral philosophy for "de-ethicizing" human action. A closer look at the development of theoretical understandings of sympathy, however, shows that instinct did not ultimately displace virtue. Moreover, a survey of practical responses to poverty calls into question the claim that political economy obliterated the Christian sphere of public charity. Many of the innovations Milbank criticizes as de-ethicizing in fact reflect serious efforts to absorb into ethical reflection and practice deep social and economic changes, which Christian theology could ignore only at its own peril. Moreover, it was sometimes non- or even anti-religious thinkers like David Hume and William Hazlitt who were soonest to see the dangers involved in appealing to instinctual behavior and providential coordination of social action. Returning to the roots of social theory allows theologians to recover lost possibilities for productive collaboration with "the secular."|
|Keywords||charity secularization Hazlitt de‐ethicization sympathy Milbank|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
David M. Craig (2004). Naves and Nukes: John Ruskin as "Augustinian" Social Theorist? Journal of Religious Ethics 32 (2):325 - 356.
James Wetzel (2004). Splendid Vices and Secular Virtues: Variations on Milbank's Augustine. Journal of Religious Ethics 32 (2):271 - 300.
John Berkman & Frederick C. Bauerschmidt (1996). II. Absolutely Fabulous and Civil. Philosophy and Theology 9 (3-4):435-446.
Gordon E. Michalson (2004). Re-Reading the Post-Kantian Tradition with Milbank. Journal of Religious Ethics 32 (2):357 - 383.
Anthony J. Godzieba (1996). I. Fear and Loathing in Modernity. Philosophy and Theology 9 (3-4):419-433.
William P. Loewe (1996). III. Beyond Secular Reason? Philosophy and Theology 9 (3-4):447-454.
John Bowlin (2004). Introduction: Parts, Wholes, and Opposites: John Milbank as "Geisteshistoriker". Journal of Religious Ethics 32 (2):257 - 269.
Ben Fine (2001). Social Capital Versus Social Theory: Political Economy and Social Science at the Turn of the Millennium. Routledge.
John Milbank (2009). Geopolitical Theology : Economy, Religion, and Empire After 9/11. In Matthew J. Morgan (ed.), The Impact of 9/11 on Religion and Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan.
O. O'Donovan (1992). Book Review : Theology and Social Theory: Beyond Secular Reason, by John Milbank. Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1990. 443 Pp. 45. [REVIEW] Studies in Christian Ethics 5 (1):80-86.
Mark G. Nixon (2007). Satisfaction for Whom? Freedom for What? Theology and the Economic Theory of the Consumer. Journal of Business Ethics 70 (1):39 - 60.
A. Sorensen (2012). On a Universal Scale: Economy in Bataille's General Economy. Philosophy and Social Criticism 38 (2):169-197.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads10 ( #114,394 of 739,318 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,029 of 739,318 )
How can I increase my downloads?