David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 35 (3):201-211 (1984)
Philosophers of science are becoming more sensitive to the claims about truth and rationality being made by sociologists of science. There is a tendency among some of these philosophers to dismiss such claims as irrelevant to philosophy of science and as self-refuting. Larry Laudan, in his 'arationality assumption', has captured the essence of positions which argue that sociology of science can only be concerned with scientific claims which are not rational (or, in some versions, 'not true'). I show that the arguments he gives in support of the arationality assumption are not sound, that the arationality assumption has absurd consequences, and I argue that the arationality assumption undermines the possibility of fruitful cooperation between philosophers and sociologists of science. I conclude that the arationality assumption should be rejected
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Sverre Wide (2009). On the Art of Being Wrong: An Essay on the Dialectic of Errors. Journal of Philosophy of Education 43 (4):573-588.
Richard C. Jennings (1988). Alternative Mathematics and the Strong Programme: Reply to Triplett. Inquiry 31 (1):93 – 101.
Similar books and articles
Christofer Edling & Jens Rydgren (eds.) (2010). Sociological Insights of Great Thinkers: Sociology Through Literature, Philosophy, and Science. Praeger.
P. Thagard (1993). Societies of Minds: Science as Distributed Computing. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 24 (1):49-67.
Gabriel Abend (2006). Styles of Sociological Thought: Sociologies, Epistemologies, and the Mexican and U.S. Quests for Truth. Sociological Theory 24 (1):1 - 41.
Howard J. Ehrlich (1962). Some Observations on the Neglect of the Sociology of Science. Philosophy of Science 29 (4):369-376.
Craig J. Calhoun (ed.) (2010). Robert K. Merton: Sociology of Science and Sociology as Science. Columbia University Press.
John Worrall (1990). Rationality, Sociology and the Symmetry Thesis. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 4 (3):305 – 319.
Ronald N. Giere (1994). Viewing Science. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:3 - 16.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads140 ( #14,225 of 1,725,806 )
Recent downloads (6 months)115 ( #4,723 of 1,725,806 )
How can I increase my downloads?