Graduate studies at Western
Criminal Law and Philosophy 1 (1):41-47 (2007)
|Abstract||In this analysis of Marcia Baron’s account of excuses, I seek to do two things. I try to draw out the nature of the distinction between forgiving and excusing. I also defend the distinction between excuses (like duress), and denials of responsibility (like insanity)|
|Keywords||Excuse Forgiveness Exemption Reasons Justification Responsibility|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Robert Franck & J. -L. Austin (1967). Les Excuses (« A Plea for Excuses »). Revue de Métaphysique Et de Morale 72 (4):414 - 445.
Marcia Baron (1988). Was Effi Briest a Victim of Kantian Morality? Philosophy and Literature 12 (1):95-113.
J. P. W. Cartwright (1982). Law, Morality and Excuses. Philosophical Quarterly 32 (127):137-150.
Marcia Baron (1988). Morality as a Back-Up System. Hume Studies 14 (1):25-52.
Joseph Raz (2010). Responsibility and the Negligence Standard. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 30 (1):1-18.
François Tanguay-Renaud (forthcoming). Puzzling About State Excuses as an Instance of Group Excuses. In R. A. Duff, L. Farmer, S. Marshall & V. Tadros (eds.), The Constitution of Criminal Law. Oxford University Press.
Jeremy Horder (2004). Excusing Crime. OUP Oxford.
Marcia Baron (2006). Excuses, Excuses. Criminal Law and Philosophy 1 (1):21-39.
R. A. Duff (2006). Excuses, Moral and Legal: A Comment on Marcia Baron's 'Excuses, Excuses'. Criminal Law and Philosophy 1 (1):49-55.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads13 ( #95,578 of 739,404 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,269 of 739,404 )
How can I increase my downloads?