Reasons for anger: A response to Narayan and von Hirsch's provocation theory
Criminal Justice Ethics 15 (2):63-69 (1996)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJennie Louise (2009). Correct Responses and the Priority of the Normative. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (4):345 - 364.
Richard Lippke (2011). Social Deprivation as Tempting Fate. Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (3):277-291.
Eli Hirsch (1993). Dividing Reality. Oxford University Press.
Daniel John Zizzo (2008). Anger and Economic Rationality. Journal of Economic Methodology 15 (2):147-167.
Peter Vernezze (2008). Moderation or the Middle Way: Two Approaches to Anger. Philosophy East and West 58 (1):2-16.
Antony Duff (2003). Appendix: Response to Von Hirsch. In Derek Matravers & Jonathan E. Pike (eds.), Debates in Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Anthology. Routledge, in Association with the Open University.
Michael Potegal (2005). Characteristics of Anger: Notes for a Systems Theory of Emotion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2):215-216.
Marion K. Underwood (2005). Observing Anger and Aggression Among Preadolescent Girls and Boys: Ethical Dilemmas and Practical Solutions. Ethics and Behavior 15 (3):235 – 245.
Uma Narayan & Andrew von Hirsch (1996). Three Conceptions of Provocation. Criminal Justice Ethics 15 (1):15-24.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-08-24Total downloads6 ( #147,054 of 556,837 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
