David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Sociological Theory 22 (1):140-160 (2004)
This paper is a critical response to the newest version of the rational choice theory of religion (RCTR). In comparison with previous critiques, this paper takes aim at RCTR's foundational assumption of psychological egoism and argues that the thesis of psychological egoism is untenable. Without that thesis, the normative aspects of religious commitment cannot be reduced validly to instrumental reason. On neither conceptual nor empirical grounds therefore can religion or religious commitment be defined comprehensively in terms of exchange theory. With the failure of psychological egoism as a point of departure, the paper articulates an alternative theory of religion, one based on the epistemic rationality grounded in religious experience and religious emotion
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Eva Illouz & Shoshannah Finkelman (2009). An Odd and Inseparable Couple: Emotion and Rationality in Partner Selection. [REVIEW] Theory and Society 38 (4):401-422.
Similar books and articles
Eric vd Luft (2004). God, Evil, and Ethics: A Primer in the Philosophy of Religion. Gegensatz Press.
Kaisa Herne & Maija Setälä (2004). A Response to the Critique of Rational Choice Theory: Lakatos' and Laudan's Conceptions Applied. Inquiry 47 (1):67 – 85.
Joseph Runzo, Craig K. Ihara & Alvin Plantinga (eds.) (1986). Religious Experience and Religious Belief: Essays in the Epistemology of Religion. University Press of America.
Keith E. Yandell (1993). The Epistemology of Religious Experience. Cambridge University.
Vincent Brümmer (1999). How Rational is Rational Theology? A Reply to Mikael Stenmark. Religious Studies 35 (1):89-97.
Eugene Garrett Bewkes, Julius Seelye Bixler & Douglas Clyde Macintosh (eds.) (1937). The Nature of Religious Experience. London, Harper & Brothers.
Douglas Clyde Macintosh & Eugene Garrett Bewkes (eds.) (1971). The Nature of Religious Experience. Freeport, N.Y.,Books for Libraries Press.
John Hick (2007). The New Frontier of Religion and Science: Religious Experience, Neuroscience, and the Transcendent. Palgrave Macmillan.
William J. Collinge (1988). The Relation of Religious Community Life to Rationality in Augustine. Faith and Philosophy 5 (3):242-253.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads32 ( #63,119 of 1,410,004 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #176,758 of 1,410,004 )
How can I increase my downloads?