David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Perspectives on Science 12 (2):191-211 (2004)
: This paper investigates the influence of Galileo's natural philosophy on the philosophical and methodological doctrines of Thomas Hobbes. In particular, I argue that what Hobbes took away from his encounter with Galileo was the fundamental idea that the world is a mechanical system in which everything can be understood in terms of mathematically-specifiable laws of motion. After tracing the history of Hobbes's encounters with Galilean science (through the "Welbeck group" connected with William Cavendish, earl of Newcastle and the "Mersenne circle" in Paris), I argue that Hobbes's 1655 treatise De Corpore is deeply indebted to Galileo. More specifically, I show that Hobbes's mechanistic theory of mind owes a significant debt to Galileo while his treatment of the geometry of parabolic figures in chapter 16 of De Corpore was taken almost straight out of the account of accelerated motion Two New Sciences
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Carla Rita Palmerino (1999). Infinite Degrees of Speed Marin Mersenne and the Debate Over Galileo's Law of Free Fall. Early Science and Medicine 4 (4):269-328.
Samuel Mintz (1952). Galileo, Hobbes, and the Circle of Perfection. Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 43:98-100.
J. Prins (1990). Hobbes and the School of Padua: Two Incompatible Approaches of Science. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 72 (1):26-46.
Donald W. Hanson (1990). The Meaning of Demonstration in Hobbes Science. History of Political Thought 11 (4):587-626.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Severin V. Kitanov (2012). Happiness in a Mechanistic Universe: Thomas Hobbes on the Nature and Attainability of Happiness. Hobbes Studies 24 (2):117-136.
Stephen Finn (2001). Geometry and the Science of Morality in Hobbes. Social Philosophy Today 17:57-66.
S. A. Lloyd (2011). The Moral Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes: A Reply to Critics. Hobbes Studies 23 (2):180-187.
Daniel Garber (2004). On the Frontlines of the Scientific Revolution: How Mersenne Learned to Love Galileo. Perspectives on Science 12 (2):135-163.
A. P. Martinich (2011). Reason and Reciprocity in Hobbes's Political Philosophy: On Sharon Lloyd's: Morality in the Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes. Hobbes Studies 23 (2):158-169.
Stewart Duncan (2012). Debating Materialism: Cavendish, Hobbes, and More. History of Philosophy Quarterly 29 (4):391-409.
Helen Thornton (2005). State of Nature or Eden?: Thomas Hobbes and His Contemporaries on the Natural Condition of Human Beings. University of Rochester Press.
Thomas Hobbes (1994/1999). The Elements of Law, Natural and Politic: Part I, Human Nature, Part Ii, De Corpore Politico ; with Three Lives. Oxford University Press.
Rosamond Rhodes (2011). Taking Hobbes at His Word: Comments on Morality in the Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes by S.A. Lloyd. Hobbes Studies 23 (2):170-179.
J. Groot (2000). Aspects of Aristotelian Statics in Galileo's Dynamics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (4):645-664.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads47 ( #71,229 of 1,724,879 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #210,931 of 1,724,879 )
How can I increase my downloads?