Graduate studies at Western
Linguistics and Philosophy 26 (5):557-593 (2003)
|Abstract||This paper deals with a series of semantic contrasts between the copula be and the preposition as, two functional elements that both head elementary predication structures. It will be argued that the meaning of as is a type lowering device shifting the meaning of its complement NP from the type of generalized quantifiers to the type of properties (where properties are conceived as relations between individuals and situations), while the copula be induces a type coercion from (partial) situations to (total) possible worlds. Paired with van der Sandt's (1992) theory of presupposition accommodation, these assumptions will account for the observed contrasts between as and be.|
|Keywords||Formal semantics Discourse Representation Theory Presuppositions Underspecification|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Laurie Zaring (1996). “Two Be or Not Two Be”: Identity, Predication and the Welsh Copula. [REVIEW] Linguistics and Philosophy 19 (2):103 - 142.
George Bealer (1979). Theories of Properties, Relations, and Propositions. Journal of Philosophy 76 (11):634-648.
Arno Wouters (1995). Viability Explanation. Biology and Philosophy 10 (4):435-457.
Bradley Rettler (2012). McTaggart and Indexing the Copula. Philosophical Studies 158 (3):431-434.
Paloma Pérez-Ilzarbe (2003). John Buridan and Jerónimo Pardo on the Notion of Propositio. In R. L. Friedman & S. Ebbesen (eds.), John Buridan and Beyond. Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters.
Alessandro Lenci (1998). The Structure of Predication. Synthese 114 (2):233-276.
Robyn Ferrell (2000). Copula: The Logic of the Sexual Relation. Hypatia 15 (2):100-114.
Tobias Hansson Wahlberg (2010). The Tenseless Copula in Temporal Predication. Erkenntnis 72 (2):267 - 280.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #114,517 of 739,461 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 739,461 )
How can I increase my downloads?