Journal of Symbolic Logic 63 (4):1371-1392 (1998)
|Abstract||In this paper we show that the compactness of a Loeb space depends on its cardinality, the nonstandard universe it belongs to and the underlying model of set theory we live in. In $\S1$ we prove that Loeb spaces are compact under various assumptions, and in $\S2$ we prove that Loeb spaces are not compact under various other assumptions. The results in $\S1$ and $\S2$ give a quite complete answer to a question of D. Ross in ,  and |
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Renling Jin & H. Jerome Keisler (2000). Maharam Spectra of Loeb Spaces. Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (2):550-566.
Andrzej W. Jankowski (1985). Disjunctions in Closure Spaces. Studia Logica 44 (1):11 - 24.
M. Angela Weiss & Rohit Parikh (2002). Completeness of Certain Bimodal Logics for Subset Spaces. Studia Logica 71 (1):1 - 30.
Paul Bankston (1987). Reduced Coproducts of Compact Hausdorff Spaces. Journal of Symbolic Logic 52 (2):404-424.
Andrzej W. Jankowski (1985). Universality of the Closure Space of Filters in the Algebra of All Subsets. Studia Logica 44 (1):1 - 9.
Arthur W. Apter (1981). Measurability and Degrees of Strong Compactness. Journal of Symbolic Logic 46 (2):249-254.
Andrzej W. Jankowski (1984). A Conjunction in Closure Spaces. Studia Logica 43 (4):341 - 351.
Slawomir Solecki (2000). Actions of Non-Compact and Non-Locally Compact Polish Groups. Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (4):1881-1894.
Renling Jin & Saharon Shelah (1994). The Strength of the Isomorphism Property. Journal of Symbolic Logic 59 (1):292-301.
Arnold W. Miller (1990). Set Theoretic Properties of Loeb Measure. Journal of Symbolic Logic 55 (3):1022-1036.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?