Evaluating agency: A fundamental question for social and political philosophy

Metaphilosophy 42 (3):261-281 (2011)
Abstract
Abstract: Many of the things we do in social and political philosophy, whether normative or critical, presuppose some understanding and evaluation of agency. To have a clear idea of our normative or critical enterprise, the underlying account of agency needs spelling out. This article begins with a descriptive account: human agency consists in power (or causal efficacy) organized as subjectivity (or selfhood), and such organization takes place through attributions of power informed by values. Some such descriptive account is useful for understanding and comparing forms of agency. But as we move beyond it to construct an evaluative account of agency, we face problems that are symptomatic of our social and political condition. While quantitative assessment of agency does not work, qualitative assessment seems out of place in our modern world of pluralism and yet is unavoidable for those who, like Habermas, take issue with such phenomena as colonization of the lifeworld
Keywords equality  populism  Habermas  subjectivity  power  agency  ideology  colonization of the lifeworld  freedom  Nietzsche  autonomy
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 10,760
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Thomas Hurka (1987). Why Value Autonomy? Social Theory and Practice 13 (3):361-382.

View all 7 references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
A. Strand (2013). Group Agency, Responsibility, and Control. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 43 (2):201-224.
S. Matthew Liao (2010). Agency and Human Rights. Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (1):15-25.
David DeMoss (2003). Connectionist Agency. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 10 (2):9-15.
Fabian Schuppert (2013). Distinguishing Basic Needs and Fundamental Interests. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (1):24-44.
Evan Tiffany (2012). Why Be an Agent? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (2):223 - 233.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-04-05

Total downloads

24 ( #70,807 of 1,098,956 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #114,620 of 1,098,956 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.