David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Metaphilosophy 42 (3):261-281 (2011)
Abstract: Many of the things we do in social and political philosophy, whether normative or critical, presuppose some understanding and evaluation of agency. To have a clear idea of our normative or critical enterprise, the underlying account of agency needs spelling out. This article begins with a descriptive account: human agency consists in power (or causal efficacy) organized as subjectivity (or selfhood), and such organization takes place through attributions of power informed by values. Some such descriptive account is useful for understanding and comparing forms of agency. But as we move beyond it to construct an evaluative account of agency, we face problems that are symptomatic of our social and political condition. While quantitative assessment of agency does not work, qualitative assessment seems out of place in our modern world of pluralism and yet is unavoidable for those who, like Habermas, take issue with such phenomena as colonization of the lifeworld
|Keywords||equality populism Habermas subjectivity power agency ideology colonization of the lifeworld freedom Nietzsche autonomy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Louis Althusser (1971/2001). Lenin and Philosophy, and Other Essays. Monthly Review Press.
Raymond Geuss (1981). The Idea of a Critical Theory. Cambridge University Press.
Axel Honneth (1996). The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. The Mit Press.
Thomas Hurka (1987). Why Value Autonomy? Social Theory and Practice 13 (3):361-382.
Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche (1968/2006). The Will to Power. London, Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Paul Benson (1990). Feminist Second Thoughts About Free Agency. Hypatia 5 (3):47 - 64.
Sharon Krause (2000). Lady Liberty's Allure: Political Agency, Citizenship and the Second Sex. Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (1):1-24.
A. Strand (2013). Group Agency, Responsibility, and Control. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 43 (2):201-224.
Miri Rozmarin (2013). Living Politically: An Irigarayan Notion of Agency as a Way of Life. Hypatia 28 (3):469-482.
Edgar Kiser (1999). Comparing Varieties of Agency Theory in Economics, Political Science, and Sociology: An Illustration From State Policy Implementation. Sociological Theory 17 (2):146-170.
S. Matthew Liao (2010). Agency and Human Rights. Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (1):15-25.
David DeMoss (2003). Connectionist Agency. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 10 (2):9-15.
Fred R. Kaen, Allen Kaufman & Larry Zacharias (1988). American Political Values and Agency Theory: A Perspective. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 7 (11):805 - 820.
David S. Stern (2000). The Return of the Subject?: Power, Reflexivity and Agency. Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (5):109-122.
David Kyuman Kim (2007). Melancholic Freedom: Agency and the Spirit of Politics. Oxford University Press.
Fabian Schuppert (2013). Distinguishing Basic Needs and Fundamental Interests. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (1):24-44.
Antonio Calcagno (2008). Alain Badiou: The Event of Becoming a Political Subject. Philosophy and Social Criticism 34 (9):1051-1070.
Kathleen Dow Magnus (2006). The Unaccountable Subject: Judith Butler and the Social Conditions of Intersubjective Agency. Hypatia 21 (2):81-103.
Evan Tiffany (2012). Why Be an Agent? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (2):223 - 233.
Added to index2011-04-05
Total downloads24 ( #102,736 of 1,696,538 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #343,026 of 1,696,538 )
How can I increase my downloads?