Are there any incorrigible empirical statements?
Australasian Journal of Philosophy 41 (1):12-28 (1963)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesManuel Campos (2003). Analyticity and Incorrigibility. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (3):689-708.
George Krzywicki Herburt (1959). The Analytic and the Synthetic. The Duhemian Argument and Some Contemporary Philosophers. Philosophy of Science 26 (2):104-113.
Lieke van Der Scheer & Guy Widdershoven (2004). Integrated Empirical Ethics: Loss of Normativity? Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 7 (1):71-79.
Leon Pompa (1984). The Incoherence of the Cartesian Cogito. Inquiry 27 (1-4):3 – 21.
J. L. Mackie (1985). Logic and Knowledge. Clarendon Press.
J. L. Mackie (1963). Are There Any Incorrigible Empirical Statements? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 41 (May):12-28.
G. Albrecht-Buehler (1976). Numerical Evaluation of the Validity of Experimental Proofs in Biology. Synthese 33 (1):283 - 312.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-08-10Total downloads12 ( #93,408 of 549,106 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,106 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
