David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 38 (2):393-410 (2007)
Eugenicists in the 1930s and 1940s emphasised our moral responsibilities to future generations and the importance of positively selecting traits that would benefit humanity. In 1935 Herbert Brewer recommended ‘Eutelegenesis’ so that that future generations are not only protected from hereditary disease but also become more intelligent and fraternal than us. The development of these techniques for human use and animal husbandry was the catalyst for the cross fertilization of moral ideas and the development of a critical procreative morality. While eugenicists argued for a new critical morality, religious critics argued against artificial insemination because of its potential to damage important moral institutions. The tension between critical and conservative procreative morality is a feature of the contemporary debates about reproductive technologies. This and some of the other aspects of the early and contemporary debates about artificial insemination and reproductive technologies are discussed in this article
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Ping He (2007). On the Phenomenon of “Return to Marx” in China. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (2):219-229.
Robert Sparrow (2008). Is It “Every Man's Right to Have Babies If He Wants Them”?: Male Pregnancy and the Limits of Reproductive Liberty. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 18 (3):pp. 275-299.
Philip G. Peters (2004). How Safe is Safe Enough?: Obligations to the Children of Reproductive Technology. OUP Oxford.
S. Matthew Liao (2008). Selecting Children: The Ethics of Reproductive Genetic Engineering. Philosophy Compass 3 (5):973-991.
D. Elsner (2006). Just Another Reproductive Technology? The Ethics of Human Reproductive Cloning as an Experimental Medical Procedure. Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (10):596-600.
Ged M. Murtagh (2004). The Limits of Reproductive Decisions. Human Studies 27 (4):417 - 427.
Martin Richards (2008). Artificial Insemination and Eugenics: Celibate Motherhood, Eutelegenesis and Germinal Choice. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 39 (2):211-221.
Stéphane Habib & Raphaël Zagury-Orly (2006). Ce Qui Ne Revient Pas au Meme. Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 14 (1):37-54.
Daniel M. Goldstein (2003). Reproductive Technologies of the Self: Michel Foucault and Meta-Narrative-Ethics. Journal of Medical Humanities 24 (3-4):229-240.
Mark Greene (2009). Choosing Future People: Reproductive Technologies and Identity. In Vardit Ravitsky, Autumn Fiester & Arthur L. Caplan (eds.), The Penn Center Guide to Bioethics. Springer Publishing Company. 307-317.
David Heyd (2013). Is There Anything Unique in the Ethics of Synthetic Biology? Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 55 (4):581-589.
Karey Harwood (2009). Egg Freezing: A Breakthrough for Reproductive Autonomy? Bioethics 23 (1):39-46.
Edward Collins Vacek (1992). Catholic 'Natural Law' and Reproductive Ethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (3):329-346.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2010-08-30
Total downloads2 ( #418,650 of 1,692,891 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #193,926 of 1,692,891 )
How can I increase my downloads?