David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
The debate concerning the proper way of understanding, and hence solving, the “is-ought problem” produced two mutually exclusive positions. One position claims that it is entirely impossible to deduce an imperative statement from a set of factual statements. The other position holds a contrary view to the effect that one can naturally derive an imperative statement from a set of factual statements under certain conditions. Although these two positions have opposing views concerning the problem, it should be evident that they both accept that the “is-ought problem” is concerned with the deducibility of imperative statements from factual statements. Later I will argue that this should not be our concern when we try to make sense of the way we reason about morality.
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Zhenming Zhai (1990). The Problem of Protocol Statements and Schlick's Concept of "Konstatierungen". PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:15 - 23.
Guy Politzer & Laura Macchi (2000). Reasoning and Pragmatics. Mind and Society 1 (1):73-93.
Ralph Wedgwood (2010). The Moral Evil Demons. In Richard Feldman & Ted Warfield (eds.), Disagreement. Oxford University Press.
Michael Bratman (1979). Practical Reasoning and Weakness of the Will. Noûs 13 (2):153-171.
Marc Lange (1993). Natural Laws and the Problem of Provisos. Erkenntnis 38 (2):233Ð248.
Luís Duarte D'Almeida (2011). Legal Statements and Normative Language. Law and Philosophy 30 (2):167-199.
Peter Singer (1973). The Triviality of the Debate Over "Is-Ought" and the Definition of "Moral". American Philosophical Quarterly 10 (1):51 - 56.
Halil A. Guvenir & Varol Akman (1992). Problem Representation for Refinement. Minds and Machines 2 (3):267-282.
Added to index2010-02-05
Total downloads355 ( #617 of 1,098,129 )
Recent downloads (6 months)90 ( #477 of 1,098,129 )
How can I increase my downloads?