David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Mind and Society 7 (1):77-94 (2007)
The term embodiment identifies a theory that meaning and semantics cannot be captured by abstract, logical systems, but are dependent on an agentâs experience derived from being situated in an environment. This theory has recently received a great deal of support in the cognitive science literature and is having significant impact in artificial intelligence. Memetics refers to the theory that knowledge and ideas can evolve more or less independently of their human-agent substrates. While humans provide the medium for this evolution, memetics holds that ideas can be developed without human comprehension or deliberate interference. Both theories have profound implications for the study of languageâits potential use by machines, its acquisition by children and of particular relevance to this special issue, its evolution. This article links the theory of memetics to the established literature on semantic space, then examines the extent to which these memetic mechanisms might account for language independently of embodiment. It then seeks to explain the evolution of language through uniquely human cognitive capacities which facilitate memetic evolution
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Dana H. Ballard, Mary M. Hayhoe, Polly K. Pook & Rajesh P. N. Rao (1997). Deictic Codes for the Embodiment of Cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):723-742.
Rodney Brooks (1991). Intelligence Without Representation. Artificial Intelligence 47:139-159.
Rodney A. Brooks & Lynn Andrea Stein (1994). Building Brains for Bodies. Autonomous Robotics 1 (1):7-25.
Joanna J. Bryson (2002). Language Isn't Quite That Special. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):679-680.
R. W. Byrne & Andrew Whiten (1988). Machiavellian Intelligence: Social Expertise and the Evolution of Intellect in Monkeys, Apes, and Humans. Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Manuel de Vega (1997). Embodiment in Language-Based Memory: Some Qualifications. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):22-23.
Susan Blackmore (2010). Memetics Does Provide a Useful Way of Understanding Cultural Evolution. In Francisco José Ayala & Robert Arp (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology. Wiley-Blackwell Pub. 255--272.
Keith E. Stanovich (2006). Memetics and Money. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (2):194-195.
Nicholas Nicastro (2004). Who is Mind Blind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (6):745-746.
Susan Blackmore (2006). Why We Need Memetics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (4):349-350.
Matt Gers (2008). The Case for Memes. Biological Theory 3 (4):305-315.
Susan Blackmore (2005). Implications for Memetics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):490-490.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads12 ( #189,864 of 1,699,835 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #77,273 of 1,699,835 )
How can I increase my downloads?