The dual-mechanism model of inflectional morphology: A connectionist critique

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (6):1026-1027 (1999)
Abstract
Clahsen has added to the body of evidence that, on average, regular and irregular inflected words behave differently. However, the dual-mechanism account he supports predicts a crisp distinction; the empirical data instead suggest a fuzzy one, more in line with single-mechanism connectionist models.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 12,084
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Joan Bybee (1999). Use Impacts Morphological Representation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (6):1016-1017.
Heike Behrens & Michael Tomasello (1999). And What About the Chinese? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (6):1014-1014.
Harald Clahsen (1999). The Dual Nature of the Language Faculty. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (6):1046-1055.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

7 ( #195,012 of 1,101,944 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #306,569 of 1,101,944 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.