David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (1):65-72 (2004)
This article considers issues concerning cases where the use of placebo is lawful or is not lawful under aspects of German criminal law. It will differentiate between cases of individual therapy and cases of supervised experiments within the scope of medical tests. Thereby, it reveals that a medication of placebo with regard to an individual patient seems to be lawful if there is no alternative possibility of a better treatment using a chemically effective medicine and if the limits of presumed consent are complied with. On the other hand, in the context of the supervised experiment, the assignment of a patient to a group treated with placebo is only lawful if the patient has been fully informed about the possibilities of a treatment and if the patient has given consent to it.
|Keywords||Placebo Criminal Law informed consent presumed consent double-blind-experiment necessity|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
David Heyd (1996). Experimentation On Trial. Why Should One Take Part In Medical Research? Jahrbuch für Recht Und Ethik 4.
Citations of this work BETA
Raymond E. Spier (2004). Placebo: Its Action and Place in Health Research Today* — Summary and Conclusions. Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (1):189-197.
Similar books and articles
Bohdan W. Wasilewski (2004). Homeopathic Remedies as Placebo Alternatives — Verification on the Example of Treatment of Menopause-Related Vegetative and Emotional Disturbances. Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (1):179-188.
Adam J. Kolber (2007). A Limited Defense of Clinical Placebo Deception. Yale Law & Policy Review 26:75-134.
Andrew Turner (2012). 'Placebos' and the Logic of Placebo Comparison. Biology and Philosophy 27 (3):419-432.
Zbigniew Szawarski (2004). The Concept of Placebo. Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (1):57-64.
Piotr Zaborowski & Adam Górski (2004). Informed Consent and the Use of Placebo in Poland: Ethical and Legal Aspects. Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (1):167-178.
Bozidar Vrhovac (2004). Placebo and the Helsinki Declaration — What to Do? Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (1):81-93.
Juhana E. Idänpään-Heikkilä & Sev Fluss (2004). The CIOMS View on the Use of Placebo in Clinical Trials. Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (1):23-28.
Thomas R. Weihrauch (2004). Placebo Treatment is Effective Differently in Different Diseases — but is It Also Harmless? A Brief Synopsis. Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (1):151-155.
Franklin G. Miller & Howard Brody (2002). What Makes Placebo-Controlled Trials Unethical? American Journal of Bioethics 2 (2):3 – 9.
Daniel Groll (2011). What You Don't Know Can Help You: The Ethics of Placebo Treatment. Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (2):188-202.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads16 ( #163,912 of 1,725,237 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #268,573 of 1,725,237 )
How can I increase my downloads?