A Critique of Karl Popper's Methodology
Akad. Förl. (1975)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | Methodology | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Call number | B1649.P64.J63 | |||||||||
| ISBN(s) | 9124155365 | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,664 |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Robert Nola & Howard Sankey (eds.) (2000). After Popper, Kuhn, and Feyerabend: Recent Issues in Theories of Scientific Method. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
John Preston (1994). Methodology, Epistemology and Conventions: Popper's Bad Start. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:314 - 322.
Douglas W. Hands (1985). Karl Popper and Economic Methodology: A New Look. Economics and Philosophy 1 (01):83-.
Karl R. Popper (1989/2002). Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. Routledge.
Bruce Caldwell (2009). A Skirmish in the Popper Wars: Hutchison Versus Caldwell on Hayek, Popper, Mises, and Methodology. Journal of Economic Methodology 16 (3):315-324.
Mark Blaug (1985). Comment On D. Wade Hands, “Karl Popper and Economic Methodology: A New Look”. Economics and Philosophy 1 (02):286-.
Alfred Schramm (2006). Methodological Objectivism and Critical Rationalist ’Induction’. In Ian Jarvie, Karl Milford & David Miller (eds.), Karl Popper: A Centenary Assessment, Volume II. Ashgate.
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |

