A Case of affirming the consequent in international law: un security council resolution 232 (1966)—southern rhodesia

History and Philosophy of Logic 15 (2):201-210 (1994)
In this note I examine a case of teleological reasoning in international law and find it to be the fallacy of affirming the consequent.I then show that and how the basis of this fallacy is a manipulation (or juxtaposition) of ?necessary? and ?sufficient? conditions.I conclude by giving reasons for thinking that this kind of reasoning is a regular feature of international law
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/01445349408837232
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,651
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
John Hund (1996). H.L.A. Hart's Contribution to Legal Anthropology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 26 (3):275–292.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

5 ( #572,499 of 1,902,709 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #452,252 of 1,902,709 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.