David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Critical Review 5 (3):421-446 (1991)
This essay surveys and assesses J. G. Merquior's principal English?language contributions to liberal social and political theory. The greatest strength of Merquior's work is his recognition that one can neither understand nor defend liberalism without first understanding and defending modernity. The greatest weakness of Merquior's work is his overly oppositional conception of the relationship between modernity and its postmodern critics, particularly his failure to recognize that both the positive and negative features of postmodernism are simply radicalizations of the positive and negative features of modernity itself. It is argued that the strengths of Merquior's work are best affirmed and its weaknesses best overcome by appropriating it within the context of a ?critical modernist? approach to understanding and legitimizing the institutions and practices characteristic of modernity and liberalism
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Thomas R. Flynn (1989). Symposiums Papers: Foucault and the Politics of Postmodernity. Noûs 23 (2):187-198.
James L. Marsh, John D. Caputo & Merold Westphal (eds.) (1992). Modernity and its Discontents. Fordham University Press.
J. G. Merquior (1988). Philosophy of History Thoughts on a Possible Revival. History of the Human Sciences 1 (1):23-31.
Diane P. Michelfelder & Richard E. Palmer (eds.) (1989). Dialogue and Deconstruction: The Gadamer-Derrida Encounter. State University of New York Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
José Guilherme Merquior (1985/1987). Foucault. University of California Press.
José Guilherme Merquior (1985). The View From Afar. New Vico Studies 3:205-207.
José Guilherme Merquior, David Felix & Paul Thomas (1989). Letters. Critical Review 3 (3-4):600-603.
Frederick Crews, José Guilherme Merquior, Rafe Champion, Leslie Graves & G. B. Madison (1990). Correspondence. Critical Review 4 (1-2):284-294.
José Guilherme Merquior (1986). From Prague to Paris: A Critique of Structuralist and Post-Structuralist Thought. Verso.
J. G. Merquior (1991). Death toHomo Economicus? Critical Review 5 (3):353-378.
Jeffrey Friedman & Ernest Gellner (1991). J.G. Merquior 1941–1991. Critical Review 5 (3):447-452.
J. G. Merquior (1991). In Quest of Modern Culture: Hysterical or Historical Humanism. Critical Review 5 (3):399-420.
Guenther Roth (1983). Book Review:Rousseau and Weber: Two Studies in the Theory of Legitimacy. J. G. Merquior. [REVIEW] Ethics 93 (2):401-.
J. G. Merquior (1988). From Marcionism to Marxism. Critical Review 2 (4):101-113.
Mark Poster (1989). Why Not to Read Foucault. Critical Review 3 (1):155-160.
Raymond Tallis (1989). A Cure for Theorrhea. Critical Review 3 (1):7-39.
Sonia Kruks (1988). Western Marxism: A Tale of Woe? Critical Review 2 (4):114-126.
Enzo Rossi (2010). Liberalism, Modernity, and Communal Being. [REVIEW] Imprints: Egalitarian Theory and Practice 10 (3):257-264.
Colin Koopman (2010). Revising Foucault: The History and Critique of Modernity. Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (5):545-565.
Added to index2011-07-29
Total downloads2 ( #373,591 of 1,168,031 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #140,420 of 1,168,031 )
How can I increase my downloads?