A proof of Hume's separation thesis based on a formal system for descriptive and normative statements

Theory and Decision 3 (4):339-350 (1973)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/bf00138192

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

What if the principle of induction is normative? Means-ends epistemology and Hume's problem.Daniel Steel - manuscript
Understanding the Separation Thesis.Joakim Sandberg - 2008 - Business Ethics Quarterly 18 (2):213-232.
Hume's Positive Argument on Induction.Hsueh Qu - 2013 - Noûs 48 (4):595-625.
What If the Principle of Induction Is Normative? Formal Learning Theory and Hume’s Problem.Daniel Steel & S. Kedzie Hall - 2010 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 24 (2):171-185.
Inferentialism and the normativity trilemma.Michael Esfeld - unknown
Integrated empirical ethics: Loss of normativity? [REVIEW]Lieke van der Scheer & Guy Widdershoven - 2004 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 7 (1):71-79.
Hume’s Is/Ought Dichtomy and the Relation of Ecology to Leopold’s Land Ethic.J. Baird Callicott - 1982 - Environmental Ethics 4 (2):163-174.
Proof in Mathematics: An Introduction.James Franklin - 1996 - Sydney, Australia: Quakers Hill Press.
A complete and consistent formal system for sortals.Max A. Freund - 2000 - Studia Logica 65 (3):367-381.
Is and ought according to Hume (etre et devoir être chez Hume).Eric Engle - manuscript
Are normative properties descriptive properties?Bart Streumer - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 154 (3):325 - 348.
Logic: Normative or descriptive? The ethics of belief or a branch of psychology?Michael D. Resnik - 1985 - Philosophy of Science 52 (2):221-238.
Barriers to Implication.Greg Restall - unknown

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-01-04

Downloads
48 (#323,919)

6 months
9 (#290,637)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Semantical Analysis of Modal Logic I. Normal Propositional Calculi.Saul A. Kripke - 1963 - Zeitschrift fur mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 9 (5‐6):67-96.
How to derive "ought" from "is".John R. Searle - 1964 - Philosophical Review 73 (1):43-58.
.Antony Flew - 1976 - In ``The Presumption of Atheism&Quot. New York: Barnes & Noble.
Some main problems of deontic logic.Jaakko Hintikka - 1976 - In Risto Hilpinen (ed.), Deontic logic: introductory and systematic readings. Hingham, MA: Sold and distributed in the U.S.A. and Canada by Kluwer Boston. pp. 59-104.
The gap between "is" and "should".Max Black - 1964 - Philosophical Review 73 (2):165-181.

View all 11 references / Add more references