Graduate studies at Western
Ethics and Global Politics 1 (4) (2008)
|Abstract||From one viewpoint, interstate borders are simple ‘artefacts on the ground’. Borders exist for a variety of practical reasons and can be classified according to the purposes they serve and how they serve them. They enable a whole host of important political, social, and economic activities. From a very different perspective, borders are artefacts of dominant discursive processes that have led to the fencing off of chunks of territory and people from one another. Such processes can change and as they do, borders live on as residual phenomena that may still capture our imagination but no longer serve any essential purpose. Yet, what if, although still necessary for all sorts of reasons, borders are also inherently problematic? We need to change the way in which we think about borders to openly acknowledge their equivocal character. In other words, we need to see a border not as that which is either fixed or that as such must be overcome, but as an evolving construction that has both practical merits and demerits that must be constantly reweighed. Thinking about borders should be opened up to consider territorial spaces as ‘dwelling’ rather than national spaces and to see political responsibility for pursuit of a ‘decent life’ as extending beyond the borders of any particular state. Borders matter, then, both because they have real effects and because they trap thinking about and acting in the world in territorial terms. Keywords: borders, frontiers, decent life, dwelling, territory, heterotopia, globalization (Published online: 7 November 2008) Citation: Ethics & Global Politics. Vol. 1, No. 4, 2008, pp. 175-191. DOI: 10.3402/egp.v1i4.1892|
|Keywords||Frontiers Territory Globalization Heterotopia Decent life Borders Dwelling|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Chiara Brambilla (2009). Borders: Paradoxical Structures Between Essentialization and Creativity. World Futures 65 (8):582-588.
Erica Fudge, Ruth Gilbert & Susan Wiseman (eds.) (1999). At the Borders of the Human: Beasts, Bodies, and Natural Philosophy in the Early Modern Period. Palgrave.
Achille C. Varzi (2003). Higher-Order Vagueness and the Vagueness of ‘Vague’. Mind 112 (446):295–298.
Josh Clark (2005). Economic Migration and Justice. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 19 (1):45-61.
Henry A. Giroux (2005). Border Crossings: Cultural Workers and the Politics of Education. Routledge.
Arash Abizadeh (2010). Closed Borders, Human Rights, and Democratic Legitimation. In David Hollenbach (ed.), Driven From Home: Human Rights and the New Realities of Forced Migration. Georgetown University Press.
Alex Mintz & Steven B. Redd (2003). Framing Effects in International Relations. Synthese 135 (2):193 - 213.
Arash Abizadeh (2008). Democratic Theory and Border Coercion: No Right to Unilaterally Control Your Own Borders. Political Theory 36 (1):37-65.
Mark Navin (2008). Fair Equality of Opportunity in Global Justice. Social Philosophy Today 24:39-52.
Marianna Papastephanou (2011). Walls and Laws: Proximity, Distance and the Doubleness of the Border. Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (3):209-224.
Alejandro A. Vallega (2012). Improper Borders. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (1):55-66.
John Maule & Gaëlle Villejoubert (2007). What Lies Beneath: Reframing Framing Effects. Thinking and Reasoning 13 (1):25 – 44.
Bart Geurts (2013). Alternatives in Framing and Decision Making. Mind and Language 28 (1):1-19.
Elisabeth Nemeth (ed.) (2012). Crossing Borders: Thinking (Across) Boundaries. University of Vienna, pp. 151-61.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads20 ( #68,365 of 739,933 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 739,933 )
How can I increase my downloads?