Book Review:Bayes or Bust? A Critical Examination of Bayesian Confirmation Theory John Earman
Philosophy of Science 61 (4):672- (1994)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
David Christensen (1994). John Earman's 'Bayes or Bust? A Critical Examination of Bayesian Confirmation Theory' (Book Review). Philosophical Review 103:345-347.
John Earman (1992). Bayes or Bust? A Critical Examination of Bayesian Confirmation Theory. Mit Press.
H. I. Brown (1994). Book Reviews : John Earman, Bayes or Bust? A Critical Examination of Bayesian Confirmation Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992. Pp. Xvi, 272. $35.00 (Cloth. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 24 (3):383-385.
Malcolm R. Forster (1995). Bayes and Bust: Simplicity as a Problem for a Probabilist's Approach to Confirmation. [REVIEW] British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (3):399-424.
John Earman (1992). Bayes or Bust? Bradford.
Neil Tennant (2006). A Note on the Irrelevance of Probabilistic Irrelevance. Analysis 66 (289):32–35.
Geoffrey Hellman (1997). Bayes and Beyond. Philosophy of Science 64 (2):191-221.
Marc Lange (1994). Earman on the Projectibility of Grue. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:87 - 95.
Lefteris Farmakis (2008). Did Tom Kuhn Actually Meet Tom Bayes? Erkenntnis 68 (1):41 - 53.
John Earman (2002). Bayes, Hume, Price, and Miracles. In Richard Swinburne (ed.), Bayes’s Theorem. Oxford University Press.
Elliott Sober (2004). A Modest Proposal. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (2):487–494.
John Earman (1993). Bayes, Hume, and Miracles. Faith and Philosophy 10 (3):293-310.
Vincenzo Crupi, Roberto Festa & and Tommaso Mastropasqua (2008). Bayesian Confirmation by Uncertain Evidence: A Reply to Huber [2005]. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (2):201-211.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-08-27Total downloads22 ( #56,242 of 549,122 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,390 of 549,122 )How can I increase my downloads? |

